Coolkid on campus

Mpumi Mlambo is a Wits BA Industrial psychology graduate who has a keen interest in entertaining the masses. She also studied entrepreneurship and development at the Raymond Ackerman Academy.  This move was inspired by her business orientated family. With so much confidence, this multi-talented actress has managed to grab the attention of casting directors from an early age. She is part of the vibrant Alcatel One Touch SA team, where she has been a brand ambassador for the last couple of months. This year she won an MTN radio Award for the Best Breakfast show presenter for The Morning Shake Up on Vowfm. She has also been part of a television series on SABC. Recently she starred in a Dove advertisement for DSTV which has made her even more visible in the entertainment industry.

Photo: provided

                                                                 Photo: Provided

 

 

When did you realise that you were interested in acting or presenting?

 I didn’t have specific interests but I loved entertaining people, so when other kids left school to go home. I stayed behind because we had to practice for a school concert. I was involved in every school concert in primary school. I was always participating in most of the Drama productions as well as mc’ing school events if not dancing at the school concert. Oh and how could I forget pageants? Every girl wanted to be a queen at some point, right and I became one too (laughs).

Who or what has been your inspiration? Why?

My mother and sister. My mother was able to put all of us through University with the little that she had. My sister is a warrior; she showed me that where you come from has little to do with your success. She taught me that with drive and hard work you can be whatever you want to be.

She also taught me that it is important to fail because we learn through failure and become better at whatever it is we do.

When was your first big break?

When I was on Sokhulu & Partners at the age of 16. It was not a big break but it was great to work with people I had never thought I would even meet in my life. I am from a small Township where even making it to matric is a privilege, being on TV seemed highly impossible but it happened.

How does it feel to be a recipient of an MTN Radio Award? How has it changed your presence as a presenter

It feels absolutely amazing to know that as a woman I was able to prove to a lot of people who think that women can’t host a prime time slot like a breakfast show and do great at it.I feel highly blessed to be a part of a great platform like Vowfm, it would have never happened without my bosses constantly critiquing me!I speak with way more purpose than I did before. I keep growing each and every day. I realised that a lot of people listen and I have the power to share empowering information with them instead of meaningless content.

Acting or presenting?

I can’t choose, if I had to choose it would really suck. The reason why I can’t choose is because the two are intertwined. As a radio host, I often have to be in character and prank people on air.I love the two just as much as I love My Mom and Jesus.

How do you juggle everything that you are doing at the moment?

The weirdest thing is I really have no idea. I just make sure that I do what I have to do. Get work done.

What are the struggles that you face in the entertainment industry on a daily?

It is very hard to be taken seriously as a female in the industry. When you are taken seriously, a number of men want to mix business with pleasure.

What can we expect from you in the future?

What do celebrities say again when asked this question, watch the space? I’m joking, I am looking forward to being a part of the biggest events this spring and summer with my Alcatel One Touch SA team as well as winning or rather slaying like the Cool Kids would say every single day.

 

 

Coolkid on campus

 

head and shoulder side clicks

Photo: Provided

Mpumi Mlambo is a Wits BA Industrial psychology graduate who has a keen interest in entertaining the masses. She also studied entrepreneurship and development at the Raymond Ackerman Academy.  This move was inspired by her business orientated family. With so much confidence, this multi-talented actress has managed to grab the attention of casting directors from an early age. She is part of the vibrant Alcatel One Touch SA team, where she has been a brand ambassador for the last couple of months. This year she won an MTN radio Award for the Best Breakfast show presenter for The Morning Shake Up on Vowfm. She has also been part of a television series on SABC. Recently she starred in a Dove advertisement for DSTV which has made her even more visible in the entertainment industry.

When did you realise that you were interested in acting or presenting?

 I didn’t have specific interests but I loved entertaining people, so when other kids left school to go home. I stayed behind because we had to practice for a school concert. I was involved in every school concert in primary school. I was always participating in most of the Drama productions as well as mc’ing school events if not dancing at the school concert. Oh and how could I forget pageants? Every girl wanted to be a queen at some point, right and I became one too (laughs).

 Who or what has been your inspiration? Why?

My mother and sister. My mother was able to put all of us through University with the little that she had. My sister is a warrior; she showed me that where you come from has little to do with your success. She taught me that with drive and hard work you can be whatever you want to be. She also taught me that it is important to fail because we learn through failure and become better at whatever it is we do.

When was your first big break?

When I was on Sokhulu & Partners at the age of 16. It was not a big break but it was great to work with people I had never thought I would even meet in my life. I am from a small Township where even making it to matric is a privilege, being on TV seemed highly impossible but it happened.

How does it feel to be a recipient of an MTN Radio Award? How has it changed your presence as a presenter?

It feels absolutely amazing to know that as a woman I was able to prove to a lot of people who think that women can’t host a prime time slot like a breakfast show and do great at it. I feel highly blessed to be a part of a great platform like Vowfm, it would have never happened without my bosses constantly critiquing me! I speak with way more purpose than I did before. I keep growing each and every day. I realised that a lot of people listen and I have the power to share empowering information with them instead of meaningless content.

Acting or presenting?

I can’t choose, if I had to choose it would really suck. The reason why I can’t choose is because the two are intertwined. As a radio host, I often have to be in character and prank people on air. I love the two just as much as I love My Mom and Jesus.

How do you juggle everything that you are doing at the moment?

The weirdest thing is I really have no idea. I just make sure that I do what I have to do. Get work done.

What are the struggles that you face in the entertainment industry on a daily?

It is very hard to be taken seriously as a female in the industry. When you are taken seriously, a number of men want to mix business with pleasure.

What can we expect from you in the future?

What do celebrities say again when asked this question, watch the space? I’m joking, I am looking forward to being a part of the biggest events this spring and summer with my Alcatel One Touch SA team as well as winning or rather slaying like the Cool Kids would say every single day.

Repertoires get reality show

Just when we thought The Repertoires had reached their peak as one of South Africa’s finest hip-hop dance crews, came the announcement of their new reality show which debuted on satellite channel Vuzu last week Friday.

The reality show, Running with the Reps, showcases “young, upcoming, talented people and how they handle the drama of trying to make it out there … being in the entertainment industry and the dramas of life itself,” says Nthato “Taydos” Malete, co-founder of the group and Voice of Wits radio presenter.

Cranking it up: Catch “Running with the Reps” at 19h30 on Friday's on Vuzu Photo: Courtesy of Vuzu

The Repertoires are between the ages of 18 and 25. Members who are keenly followed include Malete, co-founder Larry Mncube-Nhlane, Tejee “DJ Ellipsis” Mbuyamba, manager Michael Makwala, Senhle “T-Chama ”Mazibuko and dance duo “Tha Thundacats” – made up of Thato Mathlabegoane and Kea Mahlobo.

“Everyone has ambitions and dreams, but if you’re watching people trying to do something about it, it’s a whole different story. It’s inspiring,” says Malete.

Makhosini Sihlali, fellow Witsie and co-manager of the Johannesburg crew, adds that getting the idea for the reality show to materialise was not “as easy as it seems”. He explains that because they are young, people tend to not take them seriously, assuming that they’re just another dance crew chasing fame.

The show was a trending topic on Twitter, March 4.  Fans seemed fairly impressed with the first episode. On Monday, many Witsies said that Tha Thundacats were the most entertaining of the bunch.

Sihlali says that viewers of the show can expect to witness intimate moments shared by the crew and their families. In the first episode, we were introduced to Mncube-Nhlane’s girlfriend and Malete’s 19-month-old son.

Apart from watching the “Reps” pursue their dance ambitions, viewers will get to see them chasing their individual dreams to become actors, recording DJs and successful radio presenters.

In the past four years, the dance crew has secured a huge following and performed alongside artists such as Jozi, Pro and Shuggasmaxx.

For more information on the show log on to: vuzu.dstv.com/reps

For bookings: e-mail Makhosini Sihlali: msihlali@gmail.com

Johannesburg’s world-class status belongs not to its infrastructure, but to its people

The city’s digital creatives are redefining what it means to live and work in a ‘world-class African city’.

Johannesburg exists in two places at once. There is the Johannesburg you can touch, smell, feel, and hear, with its jacaranda-lined streets, exploding roads, screams of traffic, glitzy high-rises, and pungent smell.

And then there is the other Johannesburg; the one you’re taking for granted. The one that pulses through fibre cables and 4G signals, the one that lives in Instagram grids and Google Drive folders, in DMs and collaborative Canva boards. The one that causes jumpy thumbs to double tap and fingers to type three flame emojis after a post.

This is the sophisticated and highly functional digital city built not of concrete and steel, but from code, bandwidth, and human collaboration. This is the digital creative economy.

Sitting in multiple digital meeting rooms – not physical ones, because even the concept of gathering has evolved – I encounter creatives who show the slogan still holds true. Not despite Johannesburg’s dysfunction, but because of what has emerged from it.

The mythology and the reality

Johannesburg earned its world-class aspirations honestly. Founded on the world’s largest gold deposits in 1886, it became Africa’s financial heartland, contributing 17% to South Africa’s GDP. Former Reserve Bank Governor Tito Mboweli once declared it a place where “phones dial, the lights switch on, you can drink our water,”  services that would seem mundane elsewhere, but which distinguished Johannesburg as exceptional in Africa.

That distinction is disintegrating. Between July 2024 and March 2025, the city reported 97,715 power outages. Johannesburg Water’s aging infrastructure requires R1,09-billion annually just for pipe replacements, funds the cash-strapped municipality cannot provide. The city faces potential bankruptcy, having written off R13-billion in irregular and wasteful expenditure. City Power is owed R10-billion by residents and businesses who have lost faith in paying for services that barely function.

Political analyst Goodenough Mashego’s assessment is blunt.

Johannesburg arrived where it is because of mismanagement, the lack of political will to fix it and because the people who have been running it have had this vision that they can leave
Goodenough Mashego

The Centre for Development and Enterprise concluded years ago that Johannesburg is a “slipping world city,” at risk of falling off the global map entirely.

Yet, in this landscape of decay, something unexpected is flourishing.

“It’s anywhere where there’s an ecosystem of various kinds of practitioners in the realms of entertainment, design, fashion, musicians, fine art, artisans, et cetera,” says Khensani Mohlatlole, a digital creative.

Renaé Mangena, who owns a digital publication, iQHAWE Magazine, thinks that “there’s a difference between the creative space and then the creative economy.”

The creative economy, she explains, is broader — the flow of money through creative industries, how creativity feeds into markets, how cultural production contributes to GDP. It’s the macroeconomic dimension.

“The creative space in itself, maybe it’s just like the more of where we’re at as artists where any form of creativity is produced,” she continues. “I like to think of it as an ecosystem of sorts.”

Mohlatlole emphasises the relational nature of this ecosystem. “There’s a lot of interconnectedness. Like you need everyone else for it to work, essentially, for it to operate as a creative process.”

It recognises that creative work emerges from networks, collaboration, and the provision of services. A photographer needs a stylist, a makeup artist, a designer. A writer needs editors, curators, platforms.

The digital creative economy only functions as an ecosystem that enables work to be discovered, valued, and eventually monetised. And post-Covid-19, the burst of content creators, CapCut editors, and caption connoisseurs has never been more prominent in South Africa.

Zinhle Zoe, a content creator, responding to comments on her YouTube channel.
Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko

How creatives operate in Jozi’s digital creative economy

@oneandonly_rori – Digital Content Producer

Rorisang Sebiloane is unmuted on Google Meets, donning glasses and a large smile, meeting with me in a manner that has become more familiar to Johannesburg’s creatives than any physical studio.

The story of how her media agency, Helang Media, began is quintessentially millennial, shaped by the blend of desire and accident: “In varsity, I used the bursary money to buy an iPhone, naturally, as one does.”

This seemingly small purchase, coupled with a casual suggestion from an iStore sales representative and a friend’s encouragement, led her to start a YouTube channel. Sebiloane soon realised her true passion lay in the digital space, prompting her to drop out of engineering and switch to marketing.

Sebiloane recognized a powerful, universal anxiety among her peers, stating, “People start to realise that nobody really knows what they’re doing, but it doesn’t mean that you won’t get somewhere or you won’t be successful.” This moved her toward collective storytelling in the form a segment called, These Twenties, featuring interviews with people navigating their twenties, normalisingthe non-linear, often confusing, experience of young adulthood.

When I ask Sebiloane whether digital platform mechanics shape her creative choices, she pauses thoughtfully. “In the beginning, I didn’t really care because I was just doing something that I was passionate about. But then when I sat down and I said, okay, this is something that I want to do and I want to take it seriously, you definitely consider the look and feel and the tone of social media.”

But not always.

She refuses to chase viral moments which is what Instagram and Youtube thrive on. “If I’m doing street interviews, I cannot think, okay, I need a viral moment because that’s not what my platform is about,” she insists.

https://youtu.be/3f9ltIzCi08

@okbaddiek – Writer, Content Creator, Fiber Artist

Khensani Mohlatlole’s relationship with social media is more complex and more fraught. “A lot of the things that I’m interested in are by way of the internet as well. It’s quite hard to remove my creative output from it,” she explains.

Unlike Sebiloane, who came to digital platforms after discovering her passion, Mohlatlole has been online since childhood. “I’ve been on the internet since I was six years old. It’s my culture, my school, my home. It already has informed the things that I want to do.”

She recognises the trap of algorithmic thinking. “I will say there are definitely times I’m doing something with a very conscious intent of like, I need to get this many views or I want this much engagement, or I know there’s certain things people will always eat up online.”

But there is another path through this landscape, one that consciously rejects the algorithmic premise entirely.

@anele__nyanda – Film Photographer

A day later, Anele Nyanda appears on my screen, a simple backdrop of a wooden wall, her presence carrying a quiet intentionality. She’s an analog film photographer shooting on 35mm or 120mm film.

After posting her photos on Instagram, iQHAWE magazine discovered her work at an exhibition called Threaded by Faith.

“She sent me a direct message on Instagram and asked if we could sit down and have an interview, well not sit down because we did it like this (virtual meeting), so I can just tell her about my work and my practice,” Nyanda explains.

Physical spaces allow people to connect beyond the reaches of the online world. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko

Nyanda embraces a slower, more intentional creative process, preferring to work solo because, as she puts it, “It takes me quite a while to come up with something.”

This approach contrasts sharply with the fast-paced, content-heavy demands of digital platforms, where constant posting is often seen as necessary for visibility and relevance.

Her philosophy values depth over frequency — fewer images, more meaning. She’s not drawn to social media, saying, “I actually don’t enjoy social media… I feel sometimes a post won’t give my photos justice.” Instead, she favours exhibitions and physical spaces where her work can be fully appreciated.

Touching and engaging with creativity physically is as powerful a tool as snapping it to share online. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko

Still, she acknowledges the tension between her method and the digital norm: “I also understand that now it seems like every time if you’re a photographer, you need to post or do a lot of work online.” This makes navigating online platforms a challenge for her.

Mohlatlole observed that the professionalisation of digital spaces has created new rules and new expectations. If you’re a photographer, you must have an Instagram presence. If you’re a writer, you must maintain consistent output. If you’re a creator, you must feed the algorithm. But not all editorial photographers reject algorithmic thinking as categorically as Nyanda does.

@nondumisoshangee – Creative director and photographer

Nondumiso Shange greets me through the computer screen, connecting and separating us, with an enthusiasm as palpable as her passion for the creative space.

Her entry into the space follows the familiar pattern of digital discovery: she was featured in iQHAWE after they reached out to her on Instagram.

Don’t have kids and you will make it out alive
Nondumiso Shange

As a creative, Shange is clear that she is conscious of social media when producing: “If I’m working with Netflix or Multichoice, I’m thinking, how am I going to post this on my feed? What will audience engagement look like? Otherwise, when I’m just doing something for me, then I don’t really think about the feed aspect of things.”

But what if the digital creative economy needs both acceleration and slowness? Both digital-first creatives producing at a consistent basis and traditionally grounded artists developing work that demands time? Both Instagram feeds and exhibitions? Both viral moments and long-form impact? Is it sustainable?

“You have to be super, super flexible all the time. The algorithms change so much, the interests change often,” Mohlatlole explains. “There’s an aspect of you having to ground yourself in something a little bit evergreen and also understand that the moment can change all the time.”

If your next few posts don’t perform well, you might lose out on paid collaborations. It creates a high-pressure environment, even though, ironically, it’s all happening on a platform like Instagram. “Don’t have kids and you will make it out alive,” chuckles Shange.

A lot of companies nowadays look at content creators and influencers as mini ad agencies. Photo: Supplied

Money, money, money, must be funny, in a digital creative’s world

Ideas cost money. Economic privilege is an ongoing battle for creatives.

Sebiloane faces the monetisation crisis that characterises much of South Africa’s creatives where there is this gap between reach and funding access.

“I think that they don’t take it seriously,” she says cynically of institutional funders and brand partners.

“We’ve seen a move of influencers being taken seriously. Unless you have a certain number or certain reach, forget about making money from your content.”

Shange is brutally honest about her own position: “I will say I am more on the privileged end. Not because I have money but because my parents have money.”

“I’m not worried about paying for rent. I’m not worried about groceries. I’m not worried about a roof over my head. I’m not worried about little things that some creatives do have to worry about on a daily basis.”

“Expressing my creative freedom is a bit easier for me as opposed to somebody who’s like actually, they need to work for money.”

Shange makes her living through direct commissions through offering her services as well as paid brand collaborations. Until then, “everything I do is out of pocket.”

“Success looks like me being able to pay rent,” muses Mohlatlole bluntly. She’s been deliberate about treating her creative work as a business from the beginning. “I’ve done the whole nine-to-five thing. My creative work has always been a business in my head.”

She has developed multiple revenue streams as a result.

Close up shot of content creator, Hlayisani Makhubele’s, phone propped on a tripod and displaying Tiktok while posing to shoot a video. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko

“I take subscriptions on Patreon,” Mohlatlole explains. “My digital projects bring in the most revenue. And then from time to time, if it seems like a good idea, I will also do paid partnerships with brands.”

The creative cost of commercial work is undesirable at times, “Making ads is like torture. It’s like dragging your balls across glass,” she says with dark humour.

“A lot of companies nowadays look at content creators and influencers as mini ad agencies more than like working on actual storytelling content.”

Hlayisani Makhubele editing footage on her phone in the late hours of the night after shooting content during the day. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko

Despite this, she’s pragmatic about the economic necessity. “If the money is good enough, I’ll take a check. Provided they align with what I can produce.”

Nyanda does not have the same mentality, but she would like to. “Because my work has just been very conceptual, I ask people to help me (for free). I haven’t been able to monetise. It’s just been passion projects.” When push comes to shove as a creative, “you have to work on the kindness of your friends to help you out,” says Mohlatlole.

Is it seriously every man for himself?

Hlayisani Makhubele preparing to shoot to a make-up tutorial for her TikTok. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko

“The other thing with the digital space is that it’s quite dependent on you calling the shots,” says Mohlatlole, “but there’s such a lack of government funding and support.”

Mangena has experienced this first hand having to run a magazine.

@renaé_mangena – founder of iQHAWE Magazine, Digital Content Producer

“It needs money,” Mangena starts, giving a dry, mirthless chuckle with the kind of weariness that comes from knowing the biggest obstacle is always the budget.

She makes an analogy: “I can never go and say become the Minister of, I don’t know, a tech industry but I don’t know the first thing about the tech industry.” Yet somehow, cultural and creative policy is made by people disconnected from the realities of the sector.

Johannesburg’s 2040 Growth and Development Strategy doesn’t even mention the cultural and creative sector, despite the fact that Gauteng province, of which Johannesburg is the economic heart, contributes 46,3% to South Africa’s creative industry GDP and generates the highest employment impact in the sector.

Though there may be funding programs that require local governments agencies to partner with arts and cultural organisations in their cities and towns, iQHAWE is no stranger to the non-guaranteed system of applying for funding.  

“I can’t start season three of These Twenties without money!” exclaims Sebiloane.

“At times, it feels like if we had their undeniable support, it probably wouldn’t feel as fickle. It really is all on us,” says Mohlatlole with furrowed eyebrows. 

Hlayisani monetises her skill in makeup to support herself and using social media to attract clients is her go to. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko

Reimagining a world-class status as a city

They’ve described an economy that barely exists yet clearly does; one that’s generating real income and real cultural impact despite being structurally unsupported.

They’re building world-class work in a city where new high-tech offices are built while waste piles higher on the next corner, where public parks will continue to rot and where first-come, first-go at perpetually faulty robots is the new norm on the road.

But tomorrow, they’ll all log back on. They’ll post and create and collaborate and network and build.

Because Johannesburg’s world-class status now belongs not to its infrastructure, but to its people. And they’re not waiting for permission to prove it.

FEATURED IMAGE: A woman in a dark room whose face is lit up by the screen of her phone. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko

RELATED ARTICLES:

Songs of change: The impact of democracy on music copyright law

Exploring the evolution of South Africa’s music copyright laws reveals significant shifts in creative rights for artists, particularly during the transition from apartheid to democracy.

The development of music copyright throughout South Africa’s democratic transition in the 1990s demonstrated how musicians battled for recognition and rights in the face of institutionalised persecution.

The Separate Amenities Act of 1953 posed a significant obstacle for renowned saxophonist Winston “Mankunku” Ngozi during South Africa’s apartheid era. Because of legislation that forbade mixed-race concerts, Ngozi had to perform with white musicians behind a curtain, thus keeping the audience from seeing him. In a degrading incident, he was forced to perform behind the curtain at a 1964 Cape Town City Hall show with an all-white big band, while a white impostor claimed to be the saxophonist on stage.

In addition to restricting Ngozi’s ability to express himself artistically, this discriminatory regulation kept him from receiving the proper credit and payment for his contributions. Despite the commercial success of his famous 1968 record Yakhal’ Inkomo, which documented the challenges of Black artists under apartheid, Ngozi did not receive much financial gain because copyright protection was not in place. Ngozi’s experience illustrates the systemic abuses that Black artists experienced: their rights disregarded and their artistic work exploited.

According to an article in The Funambulist, apartheid-era musicians faced severe restrictions. The Separate Amenities Act, coupled with the Group Areas Act and pass laws of the early 1950s, imposed stringent mobility constraints. To move freely, musicians needed a ‘day pass’ or ‘night pass’ and had to adhere to a mandatory 10pm curfew, referenced in the African Jazz Pioneers’ song Ten Ten Special. These interconnected laws stifled artistic collaboration, social cohesion and overall freedom.

Before the country gained its independence, Black artists in South Africa worked in a closed-off environment with almost no copyright protection, leaving them open to exploitation and receiving only small compensation for their artistic efforts. This harsh environment not only suppressed artistic expression, but also failed to give musicians the recognition they deserved for their contributions.

The legacy of apartheid-era struggle music continues to resonate with contemporary artists. One of these is Johannesburg-based musician Ofentse Sebula, who attests to this enduring impact. “The legacy of the struggle music from the apartheid era plays a significant role in my music, as I too share the same sentiments,” he says. “The sentiments I share with apartheid-era musicians include resilience, cultural pride and a commitment to authentic emotional expression. Growing up in democratic South Africa, my music reflects on our nation’s complex past, its ongoing impact and the hopes for a unified future.” 

Sebula emphasises that music from that era transcended mere entertainment: “It was a voice of the people, reflecting the times they lived in,” he says. Sebula’s own music may not be overtly political, but he acknowledges the importance of storytelling through song. “My music isn’t always in line with political issues as before [in] the apartheid era, but the goal is to tell my stories and remind people that we’re still going through the same battles.”

Meet Ofentse Sebula, a composer, creator and visionary. Photo: Supplied

Music promoting social justice and resistance was particularly targeted by the apartheid administration’s severe censorship laws. Politically charged songs that dealt with issues of injustice and inequality caused artists like Hugh Masekela, Miriam Makeba and Brenda Fassie to be targeted, censored and sometimes overtly mistreated by the apartheid government. For instance, Makeba’s song Pata Pata was banned from radio stations due to its alleged anti-apartheid sentiments, which restricted her ability to perform for a larger audience in South Africa. 

Similarly, Fassie’s song I’m a Good Woman tackled themes of empowerment and defiance in the face of oppression, marking her as a voice for marginalised people. Although the song was not overtly political in comparison to some protest songs, Fassie’s bold expressions of resilience were interpreted as a challenge to the status quo. Radio stations banned her song Black President, which was a tribute to Nelson Mandela, for its anti-apartheid connotations. The government kept a close eye on Fassie’s activities, making it difficult for her to express herself freely.Masekela also suffered greatly because of his musical advocacy. His popular anti-apartheid protest song, Bring Him Back Home (Nelson Mandela), demanded the release of Mandela, who had been detained by the government since 1962. The song, composed and recorded during Masekela’s exile, rose to fame and became an unofficial anthem of the anti-apartheid struggle. The upbeat tune, with its strong chords and trumpet riffs, masked a pointed political statement that directly challenged the South African apartheid government. The fact that musicians jeopardised their freedom and careers to speak out against injustice underscores the complex relationship between politics and music.

Musicians frequently found themselves in a vulnerable position during the apartheid era due to the lack of strong legal protections for their artistic creations. At the time, the Copyright Act of 1978 offered creators limited rights and failed to address the specific challenges faced by South African artists, particularly Black musicians. Although the act was meant to protect intellectual property, it operated within a framework that largely ignored the systemic inequities of the apartheid system. 

A glaring example was the ‘Lion Trial’, involving the globally famous song The Lion Sleeps Tonight, originally written by Solomon Linda. Despite the song’s enormous financial success, Linda received little recognition or compensation, exposing the exploitative practices that thrived under the apartheid-era copyright regime. The law’s focus on formal, written agreements and legal representation left many black musicians – who often had limited access to legal resources – vulnerable to exploitation by record companies and intermediaries. 

In addition, the harsh restrictions placed on artistic expression by the apartheid administration meant musicians were forced to communicate their discontent using subtle themes, risking further marginalisation. In the end, Black artists were not protected by the 1978 Copyright Act, which was meant to update South Africa’s copyright regulations. Significantly, the Act denied many Black artists the right to their previously created works, because it did not offer retroactive protection for works created before 1978.

Unfair ownership arrangements favoured record companies and publishers owned by white people, leaving Black musicians open to exploitation due to a lack of effective enforcement measures and restricted access to the legal system. Neither did the Act address cultural appropriation, through which white artists make money from traditional Black music without acknowledgment or payment.

These flaws led to the exploitation of Black artists’ creations, a loss of royalties and creative control, and relatively little acknowledgement. The shortcomings of the 1978 Copyright Act necessitated the revolutionary shifts that came with the emergence of a democratic society, in which the defence of artists’ rights and reform of copyright were top priorities.

The democratic era has introduced stronger legal frameworks that protect intellectual property, enable artists to defend their rights, and promote a more egalitarian music industry. These advancements show the vital role copyright plays in sustaining musicians’ livelihoods and fostering innovation in South Africa’s diverse musical landscape

Sebula acknowledges the significant progress made in protecting artists’ rights. “I haven’t stumbled upon challenges when it comes to full control of my music and its ownership,” he says, recognising that this is largely due to the advancements made since apartheid. “I believe this is because post-apartheid South African artists have experienced increased autonomy in the production and ownership of their music, also thanks to organisations such as Samro [South African Music Rights Organisation] and Mpasa [Music Publishers Association of South Africa],” he says. Sebula’s experience highlights the transformative impact of democracy on the music industry, with artists now enjoying greater creative control and financial benefits.

Ofentse Sebula, bringing jazz to life, one note at a time. Photo: Ezra Selulu/Supplied

Record companies and the government organisations that had previously controlled the intellectual property and copyrights of many songs were overthrown, giving Black South African musicians more freedom to create and own their music when apartheid ended. The Copyright Amendment Act of 2019, which attempted to improve the protection of authors’ rights and remedy some of the injustices ingrained under apartheid laws, is a prime example of this change. In contrast to the 1978 Copyright Act, the new regulations improve intellectual property protections and support equitable compensations for artists.

Tsenolo Ntsane, operations manager at Mpasa and a renowned songwriter, underscores the vital significance of copyright protection for musicians. “Copyright is essential for safeguarding artists’ rights and ensuring they receive fair compensation for their work,” she emphasises.

As a champion of music, Ntsane, also known as Nolo Harmony, has navigated both the performance and regulatory sides of the industry. Her passion for music began in high school, when she developed a love for song writing. Ntsane licensed her songs at a young age and pursued music contract law in her studies.

She stresses the transformative power of copyright knowledge for musicians. “Understanding copyrights is the very thing that can help a musician create a profitable career and that’s why it is so important,” she says. This insight stems from her unique blend of artistic experience and regulatory expertise. At Mpasa, Ntsane seeks to contribute to the value of artists’ work. Through partnerships with stakeholders, Mpasa aims to safeguard musicians’ rights and foster a fair, profitable environment.

Artists who do not copyright their work face potential revenue loss, lack of recognition and exploitation, she says. Without protection, musicians risk losing ownership and control over their creations and how their music is used and distributed.

“When somebody creates a song, two rights are born,” Ntsane says. “The first is the master right, which refers to the actual sound recording of the song. This right is controlled by either the artist or the record label and generates income through mechanical royalties.

“The second right is the publisher’s right, pertaining to the composition itself – the lyrics and melody. This right represents the individual creative work underlying the sound recording, earning performance royalties whenever the song is performed publicly, played on the radio, or used in a live setting.”

Ntsane emphasised that this knowledge is particularly crucial in South Africa, where historical injustices have left a lasting impact on the music industry. “During apartheid, many Black artists were disenfranchised and lacked understanding and access to these rights, often losing control and revenue from their creative work,” she says.

To address this legacy, Mpasa prioritises empowering its members through education. “We recognise the historical disparities and strive to bridge the knowledge gap,” Ntsane says. “Through regular webinar sessions and workshops, our members gain a deeper understanding of music copyright, mastering the intricacies of master and publisher rights to safeguard their creative and financial interests.” By fostering awareness and expertise, Mpasa aims to ensure South African artists, particularly those from historically marginalised groups, can protect their intellectual property, secure fair compensation, and build sustainable careers in the music industry.

“South African musicians need to adjust to the changing landscape of the music industry as streaming services and digital platforms do, all the while fighting for just recompense and the defence of their rights,” Ntsane says. “While post-democracy laws have made a great deal of progress, there are still many challenges in the way of long-term success, which means that attempts to empower artists and increase their visibility in a more competitive market must continue.”

South Africa’s musical journey reflects its complex history and vibrant democracy. Visionary artists like Ngozi, Masekela and Fassie defied apartheid’s censorship and exploitation. Today, Samro and Mpasa champion artists’ rights, allowing musicians like Sebula the freedom of not experiencing challenges when copyrighting their music.

The Copyright Amendment Act of 2019 has improved protection for authors’ rights, addressing historical injustices. As the music industry continues to evolve, Ntsane says Mpasa “will continue to prioritise education and empowerment, ensuring artists can protect their intellectual property and secure fair compensation.”

FEATURED IMAGE: Lost in the melody. Photo by: Katlego Mtshali

RELATED ARTICLES:

Touring the city: Then vs now

The face of tourism has undergone a makeover since the dawn of democracy some 30 years ago, but whether it is a big enough change remains to be seen.

Stepping off a monstrously sized and noisy aeroplane at Johannesburg’s OR Tambo International Airport, warm air blows into your face. Your eyes squint while trying to adjust to the blinding sunlight. There is an immediate atmosphere of hustle and bustle, and you can hear several different languages being spoken around you. 

Touring the city, you make your first stop at the Johannesburg Zoo for a glimpse of the Big Five up close and personal. A stroll around the Botanical Gardens leaves you parched, so you find yourself on Vilakazi Street for some authentic South African food and beverages. Feeling adventurous, you abseil down the Soweto Towers and ride a bicycle through the Johannesburg central business district and its arty Maboneng Precinct.

The next day, you hike through the Melville Koppies, visit the Apartheid Museum, cheer on a rugby game at Emirates Airline Park (previously Ellis Park Stadium), and enter a time capsule by exploring Mandela’s House and Liliesleaf

You have an early flight out tomorrow morning, but there is still so much left to uncover; so much more still to experience. 

However, looking down at the skyscrapers from your tiny aeroplane window, you realise something: if you had visited Johannesburg 30 years ago, the city would still be bustling with tourism, but you would view all the attractions through the eyes of a fractured society.

The Soweto Towers are the peak of adventure tourism in Johannesburg, with the tiny bridge offering a unique bungee jumping experience to locals or internationals. Photo: Victoria Hill

Contextualising tourism: More than 30 years in the making

Tourism has existed for centuries, even if it constantly redefines itself. Tourism did not become a concept only when trains, boats, cars or aeroplanes were invented. People have been moving from one place to another for different reasons for as long as mankind has inhabited the Earth, which is one early definition of tourism. 

Tourism is different from expeditionism in the sense that tourists follow set paths or visit already discovered areas. Tourism can thus be for business, sports, medical, leisure, cultural or religious purposes. 

Geoffrey Wall and John Towner say the history of tourism encompasses three themes: tourism in the ancient and medieval worlds, the Grand Tour era of the 17th and 18th centuries, and the growth of spas and seaside resorts.

These themes have some factors in common, mainly that individuals who participated in these kinds of tourism were powerful and wealthy.

Until 1994, tourism in South Africa had these two commonalities as well. Only people of an upper-class, white status could indulge in movement from one place to another. Black individuals were issued with a dompas: an internal passport that restricted their movement on foot. Thus, they could not indulge in free travel around a city like Johannesburg, never mind for leisure to a seaside resort. 

This is what led to the White Paper of 1996, which described “diversity [as] where the country’s tourism attraction lies” and stated that the end of apartheid “opened the country’s tourism potential to the rest of the world and, indeed, to the previously neglected groups in society”. 

Yet, tourism only really redefined itself in later years. Black people were now granted human rights, but they could not exercise in these rights until they were given a platform to practise them.  

Itumeleng Rabotapi, director of strategic management, monitoring and evaluation at the department of tourism, says: “The above advantages notwithstanding, South Africa has not been able to realise its full potential in tourism. As such, the contribution of tourism to employment, small business development, income and foreign-exchange earnings has been limited.”

The White Paper says: “Had its history been different, South Africa would probably have been one of the most-visited places in the world.”

Johannesburg is seen as a microcosm of South Africa in this report, which investigates whether touring the city has changed since democratisation or if it will take 30 more years to master. 

State of tourism pre-1994

If you went back in time to revisit apartheid South Africa, you would find a vastly different City of Johannesburg than the one to which you are accustomed.

A tourist in South Africa was typically a white, wealthy, powerful individual or family. To take part in tourism activities pre-1994, academic IB Mkhize explains that a person needed to have disposable income, leisure time, means of transport, freedom of movement, access to facilities and destinations to visit. The apartheid regime deprived all South Africans, except white people, of these things.

Jane Skipsey, a former hotel general manager and guesthouse owner, says: “The hotel industry was very glamorous in the 1980s, with lots of glitz. The five-star Carlton Hotel [now closed] in downtown Johannesburg was buzzing with international guests.”

Academic Christian Rogerson says the crisis tourism experienced until 2010 has roots in the policies of apartheid. He places emphasis on the Soweto Uprising of 1976 and the declaration of a state of emergency in the 1980s, which led to South Africa being politically isolated from the rest of the world. 

However, despite this, Skipsey says, “Business still had to be conducted and holidays were still taken. There were not that many prominent hotel groups at the time and Southern Sun dominated the market, with business and leisure hotels aplenty.”

Justyn Spinner, managing director of Hello Lifestyle Magazine (formerly Hello Joburg, Hello Cape Town, Hello Durban and Hello Pretoria), says that in the 1980s, when his father pioneered the company, “There were no reliable sources of lifestyle and entertainment content.” 

This is what inspired Spinner senior to create a guidebook-style publication featuring lifestyle and attraction spots in Johannesburg. It was targeted at people who had the freedom of movement and choice to partake in leisure activities. 

Christo Nicolopoulos, a restaurateur in Johannesburg, says that pre-1994, “The process of opening a restaurant was less bureaucratic.” Nicolopoulos opened many high-end restaurants and he was also involved in “black eating houses… and opened the first eating house with proper plates and knives and forks in Kempton Park”. 

“Black eating houses”, or restaurants for black people, show the depth of apartheid segregation in the tourism sector. Black people were not granted access to mainstream tourism activities and were often left undignified and underprivileged in what they could pursue for leisure. 

Although Johannesburg was a world-class city with beautiful hotels and restaurants that international businesspeople or tourists would travel to see, its status was maintained on the foundation of apartheid. 

State of tourism post-1994

The numbers say South Africa’s tourism sector has been on the mend since 1994. With international sanctions lifted, and the eyes of the world on South Africa’s new democratic state, tourism experienced a boom. 

The inception of South African Tourism also helped to rebrand the country and manage its reputation. The body was instituted with the hope of allowing historically disadvantaged South Africans to benefit from the sector.

Rogerson says, “Domestic rather than international tourism is the backbone of the South African tourism economy. While the major component is accounted for by white South Africans, steady growth is occurring in the black tourism sector.” 

The tourism industry is more diverse now in terms of ownership and clientele. The introduction of small to medium-sized enterprises and the department of tourism’s enterprise development and transformation programme allowed locally made products and services to enter the tourism market. 

One example is the Yeoville Dinner Club, pioneered by Sanza Sandile. For Sandile, who grew up in apartheid Soweto, this dinner club “has become a vision and a direction of [his] childhood dream”. After moving to Yeoville at the dawn of democracy, he wanted to redefine what was once called “a derogatory shebeen in [his] grandmother’s day”.

Sandile’s dinner club “is about celebrating this piece of history through food socials”. The dinner club has “enjoyed a whole mix of international guests and real local foodies from a slightly higher LSM [Living Standards Measure]”.  

Locals often describe Yeoville – and Hillbrow – as the geographical centres of deterioration and crime. However, Sandile says his patrons view the now “accidental pan-African suburb” as “one of the most popular cultural and topical spaces in Johannesburg”.

Despite being described as the cultural heartbeat of Johannesburg, Rocky Street in Yeoville also represents the decay of infrastructure in the tourism sector post-1994. Photo: Victoria Hill

Nicolopoulos says black economic empowerment policies created a group of black diners, colloquially known as “Black Diamonds”, who enjoy splurging on champagne and cognac on occasion. 

A tourist of colour who often frequents the streets of Johannesburg is 21-year-old Uyanda Tyusha. After growing up in Johannesburg, Tyusha moved to Stellenbosch to finish his tertiary education. 

He says: “Having previously lived in Johannesburg, I often travel back to visit friends and family… I mostly find myself going out for something to eat, either lunch or dinner… I also go to attend musical festivals or concerts… I am interested in.” 

As a student on a tight budget, Tyusha dreams of “visiting the lesser-travelled areas in the country and discover[ing] more” in years to come.

Being a Born Free, Tyusha “can’t image having restrictions on the sort of travelling that [he] does”. He says if had been born during apartheid he “would most likely be restricted to movement within [or] between the townships”. There would be no chance of him visiting an establishment like the Yeoville Dinner Club.

At the National Job Summit in 1998, tourism was recognised as “the sector which had the greatest potential for reducing unemployment in the country”, Rogerson says. This potential was envisaged as manifesting through community-based initiatives and township, rural and cultural tourism. 

Tourism in Johannesburg now has an economic, social, political, cultural and educational value. In 2024, the city has endless tourist attractions, most either born from apartheid, in remembrance of apartheid and the people who lived under it, or an attempt to advantage previously disadvantaged people.

Tourism as a a socioeconomic sector

According to the 1996 White Paper, South Africa relies on tourism to increase the rate of employment, promote equality in all aspects of society, and contribute to the overall gross domestic product (GDP) and investment in the country’s economy.

South African Tourism, the marketing arm of the department of tourism, says tourism promotes “the sustainable economic and social empowerment of all South Africans”. Tourism is a multi-sectoral industry, which means its growth allows multiple sectors to grow too and for more jobs to be created. 

The White Paper found that tourism contributed 2% to the GDP in 1994, which increased to 4% in 1995. In 2024, Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) says tourism contributes an estimated 8.8% to the GDP. In 30 years, tourism has more than doubled its contribution to the economy. 

Spinner says “we should see the tourism industry as a major contributor to our GDP”, due to its diverse offerings and the welcoming culture of our country to international visitors.

There were an estimated 70,000 working in the sector in 1994 and 1.7 million in 2024. Globally, one in every nine jobs is in the tourism sector, which is about 10.7% of the global workforce. 

Skipsey says there is still a massive educational divide that limits equality in the tourism sector’s workforce. The majority of management positions were previously held by white people and unskilled positions were given to people of colour.

“This started to change with employment equity, brought about by the new government post-1994,” Skipsey says. “There are still hurdles. Some black South Africans are assigned jobs for which they are not qualified and this can end up messy.” 

Rogerson estimates that 50,000 international tourists visited South Africa in 1986. When 1994 rolled around, the White Paper estimates South Africa welcomed 4.48 million international tourists. Stats SA estimates this number to be 10.7 million in 2024. 

Stats SA says tourism is set to grow 7.6% annually over the next decade. This is above the overall economic growth rate of 1.8%. 

To residents of Johannesburg, this might come as a shock. The city is not seen as glamorous by its inhabitants, but rather as deteriorating by the second. 

Restaurateur Nicolopoulos says, “our economic hub, Johannesburg, is avoided by tourists”, due to the “lack of law and order, corruption and high levels of crime”. The city has simply become “a transit port of entry for Cape Town and the Kruger National Park”.  

Overall, the department of tourism’s Rabotapi says tourism is “well-positioned to link under-developed regions with the developed ones as it transcends spatial and geographic boundaries”.

Tourism has a unique ability to promote and maintain harmony on the premise of a shared love for one’s country.

A peek into the next 30 years

Although tourism is classed as a leading socioeconomic sector in today’s South Africa, it still has unlocked potential. 

Rabotapi says: “Growth of tourism to and within South Africa requires the portfolio to provide an enabling environment.”

This includes improving tourism assets and infrastructure, ensuring tourism safety and access to basic services, and developing a culture of travel among South Africans so the sector is supported domestically. 

Throughout South Africa’s 1.27 million square kilometres, Johannesburg’s province of Gauteng takes up a mere 18,000. Yet, it has made significant strides in transforming the tourism sector during the 30 years of democracy.

Touring the city was once a privilege; now, doing so is a reminder of what humanity went through to be alive today.

FEATURED IMAGE: Johannesburg is known for the spotting of Jacaranda trees all about its suburbs, and they have become a tourist attraction in Spring time. Photo: Victoria Hill

RELATED ARTICLES: