The Palestine Solidarity Committee (PSC) holds Wits University accountable for silence on Israeli apartheid.
The Wits PSC initiated a campaign calling out Wits’ complicity in Israeli Apartheid.
Wits University has a history of activism against injustice but remains silent to the current conflict.
The PSC accuses the university of platforming Zionism through hiring decisions and by marginalising pro-Palestinian voices.
The history of Wits University is difficult to ignore as you wander through the halls. On every step, there’s a story; on every lawn lingers cries of resistance. As a student, one can take pride in knowing that they are following a generation of activists in an institution which refused to stay silent in the face of apartheid. Today, students continue to hold power to account, yet, with a key difference – Wits University is now the institution that is being held accountable.
The Wits Palestine Solidarity Committee (PSC) along with their supporters have carried out protests against Israeli apartheid for years, with students gathering, holding red, white, and green flags, raising their voices, calling for Palestine’s freedom. Following South Africa’s International Court of Justice (ICJ) case against Israel, the PSC called on the institution to take a firm stand on the Genocide. Though the university called for a ceasefire in Palestine, the institutions broader inaction on the matter was the driver of a much more cutting campaign: ‘Wits’ Complicity in Israeli Apartheid.’
Collage of PSC campaign posts. Graphic: Ekta Seebran.
From liberation to complicity
Affirmed by the university itself, Wits has been an ‘open university’ since its establishment. Committed to maintaining “a firm, consistent and vigorous stand against apartheid, not only in education, but in all its manifestations,” protesting avidly against the Extension of the University Education Act of 1959, which controlled the acceptance of non-white students into South African universities.
In the PSC’s letter of demands to the university, it was noted that while the university confirmed that they have not entered into any new agreements with Israeli companies in the past eight years, but, “are extremely troubled to learn that Wits remains implicit in doing business with Israeli companies, accepting donations from the Israeli embassy, and employing a former IDF officer as one of the University’s professors.”
Though the university stays silent, the PSC campaign alleges that Wits shows its complicity through key administrative decisions made.
Who speaks in our lecture halls?
Karen Milner is an associate professor of psychology at the Wits University; she is also the National Chair of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD).
Following South Africa’s ICJ proceedings against Israel, Milner published a letter addressed to President Cyril Ramaphosa. The letter outlines the board’s disdain with the country’s case against Israel, calling the 7 October 2023 attack, “the greatest tragedy since the Holocaust 78 years ago.”
While acknowledging the severity of 7 October 2023 attack, this concern, however, ignores the history that has led to the current genocide against Palestinians.
The PSC lay the groundwork, highlighting that Milner not only defended Israel against the ICJ and deem the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) Movement as antisemitic, but also dismissed allegations of genocide against Palestinians.
Wits Vuvuzela spoke to Milner who commented, “As an Academic I believe and advocate that institutions of higher education, and especially Wits University, need to be inclusive spaces, that foster diversity and welcome a multiplicity of views. I respect the views of students and staff with views that may differ from mine, and hope that others can do the same. My issue with the Wits PSC’s campaign is that it seeks to silence any dissenting or different opinion and is contrary to the values of our constitutional democracy and intellectual freedom.
“Shutting down and threatening Jewish voices in any environment, because they don’t adhere to a simplistic ideological stance, is deeply problematic, and antithetical to the principles of our university and our country,” she said.
In her concluding remarks, Milner expressed issue with the use of the word ‘apartheid’ in the context of Israel and Palestine, calling it “biased”.
But, for the PSC, Milner’s stance is not an academic one, but one that contravenes the Palestinian reality.
As South Africans we have the best front line to say what apartheid is and what is not apartheid. So, I completely disagree with that. I don’t think it’s a biased notion.”
Much like the pass system of apartheid South Africa, Palestinian movement in Israel has been restricted since the year 2000. According to OCHA(The United Nations Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs), Israel has imposed additional restrictions across the West Bank and East Jerusalem, with over 800 movement barriers, since October 2023. These include checkpoints and roadblocks among others.
These barriers have impacted access to healthcare and food supply among others. According to an update by OCHApublished 28 August 2025, the humanitarian crisis on the Gaza Strip and the West Bank has intensified, with increased famine, loss of life, illness, and displacement.
“So, what is that? If that’s not apartheid, not genocide, please tell me what it is,” Hussain said.
Wits Vuvuzela spoke to Irfaan Mangera, Wits alum, activist, and educator. He said, “as an alum, I feel ashamed that an institution we studied at that claimed to be progressive and justice-centric actually is the opposite, and I think more institutions need to stand up. Apartheid in South Africa didn’t end on its own.
“Institutions globally boycotting South Africa, whether it was the sports boycotts where footballers weren’t allowed to travel, academic institutions that took a principled moral stance that said we can’t be inviting academics from South Africa over if they are complicit in apartheid, and that actually applied the necessary pressure to force the white government of the time to go to the negotiating table. This is what’s required of institutions today. It needs a backbone, and it needs moral clarity on issues like this,” he said.
Opposing narratives
Though Wits has withheld its voice, actions have impact. The PSC further implicates the university in platforming Zionism through the South African Union of Jewish Students (SAUJS) propaganda and marginalising pro-Palestinian voices, with PSC events facing surveillance, censorship, and intimidation.
In response to this allegation, Jacob Boner, Wits SAUJS chairperson, said, “SAUJS operates within the guidelines of the university code of conduct at all times. Our events also often focus on being inclusive and open to all ideas and fostering constructive dialogue. PSC events, by contrast, often focus on large performative gatherings where disruption is favoured over dialogue.”
He continued, “Zionism is also a core ideology and belief for nearly all Jews and, therefore, the call that platforming Zionism on campus is problematic is a call to denounce the right of the hundreds of Jewish students who SAUJS represents to freely express themselves on campus.”
Hussain spoke to Wits Vuvuzela at a Marikana memorial on 22 August 2025, on Amic Deck, she said, “Today’s event took me three weeks to get approved, it’s not a new thing, we’ve done it previously, there’s precedence.”
“We needed an electric source. Vida wasn’t allowing us to use the electric source. Why? Did they say why? Political affiliation. That’s literally all they said.”
Wits Vuvuzela reached out to leadership but are yet to receive a response.
Silence as complicity
Wits University, west campus view of the Great Hall and Library Lawns, overlaid by the Palestinian flag and facts retrieved from OCHA. Photo: Sourced/ Wikipedia [Copyrighted free use, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=98183122]. Graphic: Ekta Seebran.
The question that lingers at the steps of the Great Hall, then, is whether Wits will honour its history of resistance or let its silence mirror the volume of its part defiance. The answer to this remains to be seen, but for the PSC and their supporters, the echoes of South Africa’s history of Apartheid are heard in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Through this we are reminded that silence is, in fact, an act of violence.
FEATURED IMAGE: Wits University, west campus view of the Great Hall and Library Lawns, overlaid by the Palestinian flag. Photo: Sourced/ Wikipedia [Copyrighted free use, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=98183122]. Graphic: Ekta Seebran.
Connected through the stream but disconnected through ideology, the great ‘coloured’ debate.
Tyla has just released her new EP, WWP, with four songs.
Despite chatter that the EP is a ‘flop’, streaming numbers are soaring.
Many Americans refuse to respect South Africa’s ‘coloured’ history but demand respect for themselves.
The newly appointed ambassador for the South African coloured community, Tyla, has just released her new Extended Play (EP), yet the online conversation always seems to revert to her identity.
Tyla released her EP ‘We Wanna Party’ (WWP) a month ago and conversation has swirled, with discussions over whether the released music was a ‘flop’ or not. Short answer: it was not.
In an article written in OkayAfrica, it was stressed that in the digital age we can no longer measure an artist’s success through units of sold music, but rather, through number of streams, and Tyla’s streaming stats are soaring, with WWP gaining over 60 million streams on Spotify, according to the OkayAfrica.
This makes you wonder why narratives about her downfall have been spreading. Well, there is one persisting reason, she’s coloured, and African Americans don’t like – and refuse to understand – that.
Wits Vuvuzela spoke to Feven Merid, a student at Pitzer College in California who spent one month studying at Wits University earlier this year. Merid said, “I think that the way that she’s been received recently, especially with her new EP and how she has identified herself, has been mistargeted in a way.”
“Tyla, who proudly identifies with her South African culture, […] comes to the States, a place where slavery still has a very painful meaning for Black Americans, I think it kind of felt like a bit of a wound opening for many Black Americans,” she said.
The word ‘coloured’ in America, is associated with the segregated Jim Crow era. The one-drop rule was enforced, where anyone with the slightest bit of African DNA was classified as black tomaintain the purity of the white American race. So, in that context, Tyla is considered black.
The Root, an African American online magazine, attributed her EP’s perceived ‘flop’ and prospected future downfall to her racial identification, citing Joe Budden, a podcast host, who implied the ignorance of her youth caused the ‘mistake’.
“As a young artist in America, you should read the room,” he said.
However, as a South African and in a world that no longer solely caters to the US, why can’t mutual understanding and respect be foregrounded rather than forcing assimilation?
Rosey Gold, a European DJ living in South Africa, explained it well, saying that Tyla never expected Americans to use the terminology, she just expected an understanding of who she is and where she came from.
Significantly, Tyla’s audience is not limited to America. According to Music Metrics Vault, North America doesn’t even make up the top five of singer’s global streams. So, maybe Tyla isn’t the one who needs to ‘read the room’.
FEATURED IMAGE: South African artist, Tyla. Photo: Supplied/Wikipedia [WBNX-TV 55, CC BY 3.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0>, via Wikimedia Commons].
As a student, budgeting is everything, but what happens when choosing cheap comes with human consequences?
A perfect morning: Well rested, clear mind, and Temu order en route. It’s a good day…but not for everyone.
At that very same moment, a clothing manufacturer, once with a booming business, now suffers the consequences of fast fashion, starting their morning by letting go of workers. And in a small town in China, a dedicated, but exploited, worker faces the toll of another 75-hour week. All working to satisfy eager consumers.
‘Smashing and grabbing’ the South African economy
Like a thunderstorm, Shein emerged in South Africa in 2020, and not so long after followed the lightening that is Temu, in 2024. Shoppers scrambled online following the movement toward cheap products.
Newzroom Africarecently reported that as Shein and Temu grow, more jobs in South Africa will be at risk, with News24 reporting that 8000 jobs have already been lost in the past four years. Adding insult to injury, the Localisation Support Fund (LSF) estimates that with Shein and Temu’s expansion into the local market, by the year 2030, 34 000 local jobs will be lost.
In an interview with Newzroom Africa, Simon Eppel of Southern Africa Clothing and Textile Workers’ Union (SACTWU) said, “This is not just a clothing, textile, footwear, and leather problem. Some of these platforms […] ship and sell other goods, so in fact this affects the entire economy.”
Eppel called this ‘smash-and-grab’ economics, “these online offshore retailers are conducting business in the country at all costs to us”. Simply put, Shein and Temu entered the market aggressively, attracted local consumers with low prices, and ate into the local market share.
Compounding the problem, according to the Daily Investor, Shein and Temu have been exploiting an import rule, allowing them to evade paying VAT on packages valued under R500. To level the playing field, however, SARS recently revised this rule, requiring all imported goods to pay both a 20% flat rate and the standard 15% VAT.
However, the humanitarian impact would remain.
75-hours later…
Early this year the BBC published an investigation into ‘Shein village’, where nests of garment factories are located, in the Panyu district of Guangzhou, China.
Speaking to workers and owners of 10 factories in the district, journalist Laura Bicker found that despite Chinese labour laws setting the working week limit at 40 hours, the Shein workforce charge through 75-hour long working weeks, which equates to 15 hours a day over five days or 12.5 hours over six days.
On top of this, low wages and the use of child labour add to the unethical labour practices at these factories.
Voices of young consumers
Wits Vuvuzela spoke to Thiko Rautshahalo, B.A. Law student, who said that she, “use[s] Shein and Temu for a certain aesthetic, when you go to [local stores] you just can’t find certain aesthetics, it’s also cheaper.”
Kirsten Calvert, Wits honours in psychology student, shared different sentiments about the company, saying, “I ordered clothes but sent them all back […] I realised that one quality thing is better than ten bad [quality] things.”
As students, it can be difficult to find clothing options that fit your style and are affordable, but there are many more sustainable alternatives, such as thrifting. On our very cown ampus we have Zaza Clothing, which you can find on the first floor in the matrix. Here you can shop sustainably while still keeping your budget in mind.
So, next time you click ‘purchase’ on Shein or Temu, consider what you are truly paying for.
Israel adds to the already harrowing death toll of media workers reporting from Palestine.
Journalists Against Apartheid take a moment to commemorate lost Al-Jazeera colleagues.
Anas al-Sharif was among the six journalists recently targeted by Israel.
South African journalists and supporters emphasise the need for the media to speak up and to report the truth.
It was a sombre and almost muted affair, as a handful of South African journalists gathered on August 14, to honour slain colleagues in Palestine.
Journalists Against Apartheid gathered outside the Al-Jazeera office in Auckland Park, holding candles, placards and some draped in keffiyehs to remember those who have been killed by Israeli forces.
Journalist holding a candle in commemoration of lost media workers in Gaza. Photo: Ekta Seebran
Housed in a tent outside Gaza City’s al-Shifa hospital, Anas al-Sharif, a Palestinian journalist for Al-Jazeera Arabic, along with colleagues Mohammed Qreiqeh, Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, and freelance journalists Mohammed al-Khalid and Momen Aliwa, were killed in a targeted Israeli airstrike.
Israel admitted to targeting al-Sharif on the belief that he was the head of a Hamas terrorist cell but has yet to produce any evidence of this.
Faseegah Davids, coordinator of the Palestine Solidarity Committee, said, “making people feel powerless is the tool of the oppressor, journalists being silenced and killed in Gaza are used to misguide the world in terms of narrative and truth. But we know the truth. They have already been exposed.”
Since October 2023, 272 journalists and media workers have been killed in Israel.
Placards made by supporters. Photo: Ekta SeebranSupporters taking a moment of silence for the lost journalists. Photo: Ekta Seebran
Josephine Kloekner, freelance journalist and organiser of the vigil, said, “It’s not a time we can just be hesitating, because all our colleagues are dying, we have to show our faces and speak up, because if we don’t, who will do it for us.”
The gathering heard voices from not only journalists and supporters of Palestine, but also from media workers on the field sent a message to be read to the crowd, which said:
“The target is truth. We knew them not as bylines, but as friends, as colleagues. Whenever we could get coffee, we shared it with them […] We ran towards danger, not away from it, because we are fearless. But in actual fact, we live in fear. It’s our natural state, and we know that the world must see. We mourn today, but we pick up our cameras tomorrow […] We can never allow Gaza to die without us.”
FEATURED IMAGE: Photos of Al-Jazeera journalists killed on 10 August 2025. Photo: Ekta Seebran.
Though information and communication technologies (ICTs) broaden our reach, with its evolution emerges the monster that is technology facilitated gender-based violence.
Technology Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (TFGBV) plagues youth in the digital age.
Lack of education, adequate law enforcement, and ability to identify the cyber abuse allows the problem to persist.
The Wits Gender Equity Office works separately from government, allowing for increased reporting of abuse by student.
In a move to increase awareness about TFGBV, Wits students have joined the youth-led initiative, SafeDigitalVoices, to combat the persistence of cyber-stalking, non-consensual image sharing, and online harassment, in the digital age.
TFGBV is a term which addresses the problem of abuse, exploitation, and harassment through digital platforms, including dating apps and social media. As it is a relatively new concept, but an important one at that, education on TFGBV is minimal and as a result, many do not know how to identify it.
It is important to know the “difference between a joke and being violated,” said Dr. Aretha Asakitikpi, coordinator of the SafeDigitalVoices TFGBV course. She explained that TFGBV is ‘internalised’, describing that it has become normalised in popular culture.
Jazz Selektor and SafeDigitalVoices member, Buntu, spoke to Wits Vuvuzela about her experience. “I experienced it a lot during 2017 and ‘18 because of the way that my boobs look. I went through so much backlash on social media which led me to deactivating my Facebook account,” she said.
This brings to light the problem of reporting TFGBV and the consequent challenges of law enforcement. Dr. Asakitikpi says that, “law enforcement understand the physical,” but not the intangible. Cyber bullying cannot be seen or touched.
Many of these cases go unreported. According to Dr. Asakitikpi, this is because youth don’t often tell elders, such as their parents or the authorities, due to fear of being shamed, misunderstood, and even ignored.
“Technology is growing faster than our laws,” Asakitikpi said. She described a case she came across during her research in which a respondent reported being stalked online and was met with negligence due to lack of training on the new age beast.
“They didn’t know what to do,” she explained.
Wits Vuvuzela spoke to Bhekamndeni Mkwanazi, a staff member at the Wits Gender Equity Office (GEO), who argued that the GEO is more effective than government law enforcement because they “use an inquisitorial approach, we ensure that we keep the complainant safer and also the respondent,” explaining a belief in restorative justice rather than solely punishment.
“We conscientise them, so whenever they do come back to the university, they’re better people than what they were,” he said.
Identifying and reporting TFGBV is extremely important, not only to protect the subject of the harm, but to hold perpetrators accountable, working toward combatting online norms that are causing or perpetuating harmful behaviours.
To report TFGBV cases you can email them at: info.geo@wits.ac.za, or call the crisis hotline: 0800 111 331. They are also available on Facebook: witsgeo and X: @WitsGEO.
FEATURED IMAGE: Image of the TFGBV awareness team, working with SafeDigitalVoices. Photo: Dipalesa Letuka.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers undeniable convenience, but at what cost to our environment?
Excessive use of AI negatively impacts the global carbon footprint.
Search engines like Ecosia, which operates on renewable energy, may pave the way for a carbon-negative future.
Students are divided between choosing Ecosia over ChatGPT, as the AI tool provides an ease that Ecosia has not yet replicated.
In a recent investigation by TheDaily Maverick it was found that a whole generation is using ChatGPT or other large language models (LLMS) to secure their degrees. Not only posing a threat to academic integrity, but the environment as well.
Wits Vuvuzela spoke to Professor David Phaho, Director of the African Energy Leadership Centre and Discipline at Wits University, about AI and the global carbon footprint.
“They require 99.99% availability, implying that the energy sources which are available should be available at all times. You cannot switch on the sun at will. So, at the moment they [tech companies] are huge consumers of gas, oil, and coal, contributing to CO2 [carbon dioxide] emissions,” he said.
It is estimated that the data centre’s LLMs like ChatGPT and Claude operate from, use the same amount of water in a single day as 30,000 residential homes would. Data centre’s use freshwater to cool their servers.
In Berlin, Germany, circa 2009, the non-profit organisation and search engine, ‘Ecosia’ was born. Though not popular at the time of inception, increased climate change awareness has made it a sustainable alternative for young people.
Ecosia uses renewable solar energy to power its servers and invests 80% of its profits in planting trees to reduce CO2 levels in the atmosphere.
Phaho said the problem with companies using non-renewable energy rather than renewable energy is not cost, but accessibility. He said what is needed is, “policy at government level to incentivise [the] private sector to invest in renewable energy coupled with energy storage, because if you can store energy when the sun is shining, you can continue powering.”
Nokwanda Ndlovu, a member of the Wits Climate Justice Charter Movement (CJCM), is a recent adopter. “It was not too long ago that I discovered Ecosia as I only learnt about AI contributing to carbon emissions about a month or two ago through a course on sustainability, before this I did not use AI often,” she said.
“With this knowledge,” she added, “I’m not choosing it [AI].”
Another Wits CJCM member, Khavisani Annah Mhlarhi, said: “I think as students we associate activism with being on the ground fighting for justice, which is always good, but you can contribute to the fight in subtle ways, like doing an Ecosia Search instead on using AI or Google.”
Though even with this goal, students default to ChatGPT for convenience.
Despite knowing about the carbon emissions, Mhlarhi uses AI to check the grammar on her assignments. “We need ChatGPT to survive,” she said.
So, what does this mean for the future of climate activism? Will more students make environmentally conscious decisions, or will AI persist because of the ease it brings?
FEATURED IMAGE: A hand holding a magnifying glass and through it seeing the ChatGPT logo. Source: ChatGPT logo sourced from Wikipedia. Graphic: Ekta Seebran.
Wits postgraduate students tackle a conversation on black masculinities in South Africa, examining the impact of apartheid, absent fathers, and social pressures.
Book club dives into Dr. Malose Langa’s, “Becoming Men: Black Masculinities in a South African Township.”
Langa examines the lives of 32 young boys living in Alexandra, over 12 years.
Panellists highlight the performative nature of both masculinity and femininity, signifying the need to create ‘safe spaces’ for positive self-expression.
For their first pick, the Division of Student Affairs’ Postgraduate Book Club, discussed Senior Psychology Professor, Dr. Malose Langa’s book, ‘Becoming Men: Black Masculinities in a South African Township.’
Langa’s work looks at a study done, from 2007 to 2018, on 32 boys from the Alexandra township. In chapter one of his book, ‘What makes a man a man’, Langa starts with the grim environment, “The place is overcrowded and underserviced, and poverty, violence, and crime are rife.”
Through his study, Langa examines how masculinities were understood and formed over time, and the roles these developments played in negative masculine outcomes, such as abuse against women and other men, alcoholism, gangsterism, and more.
“If crime is being committed by young males, then it means that young males are who we need to focus on, and that’s how the journey started,” said Langa on the night.
Through stories like that of Hilton, a young boy who struggled with his sexuality, Themba, a teen father who fought for a relationship with his daughter, and Simon, the youngest son of four who tried his hardest to reject the norms that took boys down dangerous paths, we learnt about how masculinities in a township are a performance.
In the chapter titled ‘Backdrop to Alex – South African Townships and stories in context’, Langa explained that through a community’s fight against the Apartheid regime “various other forms of violence also increased in townships, including violent crimes …[the] rise of the ‘jackrolling’ phenomenon, whereby gang members committed violent crimes that included harassing, kidnapping and raping young women.”
Iracelma Adriano, a BSc Honours student in Geography at Wits and panellist at the book club, said, “There was a time in the book where the boys actually had to take photos with their disposable cameras and then they had one-on-one interviews with prof and they showed parts of their daily life, what was important to them, and afterwards there was a focus group and now they had this pressure of other men around them, and what they shared was different, and this to me just solidified the idea that masculinity and femininity are things that we perform, they are not inherent or fixed constructs.”
Reading these stories and appreciating the personal journeys of these boys exhibits how masculinities are shaped by historical forces and the subsequent social expectations that arose. Langa’s study reflects a key idea within feminist thought – that gender identities are not predetermined but constructs of society, politics, and history.
To dive deeper, specifically for the context of this book, one must look at the intersectionality discussed by the feminist movement, which recognises that identities are also shaped by one’s experiences and influences. Absent fathers and the vacuum mothers fill was one of the issues discussed. While mothers were credited with helping boys understand their emotions, the flip side was that this was trumped by the societal expectations to be more masculine, ‘Jaro-boys’, who were sexually successful with girls, defining them as men.
Langa’s book ends with a call for the urgency to create ‘safe spaces’ for ‘listening, hearing, and action’, calling for proactive educational measures, encouraging conversations around masculinity, and support for mothers as role models for emotionally healthy sons.
To end the book club’s discussion, the professor emphasised that the “responsibility is on all of us, what is it that you are doing in your private space?”
FEATURED IMAGE: Dr. Malose Langa’s book, “Becoming Men: Black Masculinities in a South African Township.” Photo: Ekta Seebran
With the release of Marc Webbs’ Snow White, the Wits Palestine Solidarity Committee call for a boycott of the film starring former Israeli military officer, Gal Gadot.
Wits PSC call to boycott Snow White due to the casting of Gal Gadot, former IDF officer.
SAUJS member says that the boycott is “harmful” and “discriminatory”.
PSC supporter says the action is not about the film, it’s about not supporting someone who participated in genocide.
At the end of March 2025, the Wits Palestine Solidarity Committee (PSC) took to Instagram and called on supporters to boycott director Marc Webbs’ film, Snow White, starring Gal Gadot, former member of the Israeli Defence Force (IDF).
This cinematic protest call follows the 20-year Boycott, Divestment, and Sanction (BDS) Campaign in support of Palestine.
According to the official BDS website the campaign is “inspired by the South African anti-apartheid movement, the BDS urges action to pressure Israel to comply with international law … Israel maintains a regime of settler colonialism, apartheid, and occupation over the Palestinian people. This is only possible because of international support … the world help[s] Israel to oppress Palestinians.”
Jacob Boner of the South African Union of Jewish Students (SAUJS) at Wits, says that “SAUJS stance on the BDS led boycott of films due to actor’s [Gal Gadot] political views is harmful.”
He further explained that they believe, “these are not boycotts against entities such as governments and corporations, but against individuals, boycotting a movie because it has an Israeli actress in it is tantamount to persecuting her for her religion and is thus discriminatory.”
In contrast, Wits student and PSC supporter Sameera Karolia, says that she, “completely and unapologetically support[s] the BDS led boycott of Snow White and all projects involving Gal Gadot […] by proudly supporting Israel’s war, she [Gadot] is complicit in the violence and ongoing oppression of Palestinian people.
“This isn’t about judging a film, it’s about refusing to support people who are complicit in genocide.”
In the conversation around the boycott of Snow White, it is also significant to note that the lead of the film, Rachel Zelger, is an outspoken supporter of Palestine, but there has been no call to boycott the film by Zionist movements.
To this, Boner says, “unlike the harmful BDS movement we do not endorse boycotts of art based solely on an individual’s identity or beliefs, we believe that opening engagement and dialogue is the way forward – not the demonisation of an entire group of people and their beliefs.”
When asked if Zegler’s stance would impact her decision to boycott, Karolia said, “No, it does not. The boycott targets Snow White because of Disney’s deliberate decision to platform and profit a vocal Zionist, who has actively participated in Israel’s genocide – both as a former IDF member and through her public statements.”
Discussing what message the boycott sends, Karolia said that it, “sends a message that entertainment isn’t worth moral compromises.”
Whether choosing to boycott the film or not, one cannot argue that film – and all art for that matter – is apolitical. Art and, significantly, film – considering its reach – has the ability to send messages globally. The act of endorsing or boycotting is a personal decision that demands accountability.
FEATURED IMAGE:Snow white (2025) cover. Photo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snow_White_(2025_film)
Women for Change take their petition to the Pretoria Union Buildings in a call for justice against gender-based violence and femicide.
The group wants gender-based violence and femicide to be declared a national disaster
Over 1500 signatures in support of the call have been secured
Activists say a state of emergency would unlock key resources
The Women for Change movement took a stand on Friday, April 11, at the Union Buildings in Pretoria, to hand over their petition declaring gender-based violence and femicide (GBVF) a national disaster.
The non-profit organisation argues that the petition is the result of government inaction in the face of increasing cases of GBV. Despite the government adopting the National Strategic Plan on Gender-Based Violence and Femicide in 2020, “on the ground, we haven’t felt any difference,” said Sabrina Walter, the founder of Women for Change.
The handover of the petition is the culmination of a social media campaign which saw the organisation garner over 1500 signatures in support of its call.
The organisation’s website shows that 5 578 women and 1 656 children were killed between April 2023 to March 2024, with over 42 000 rape cases reported and an estimated 95% not reported. Above this, according to the second-quarter SAPS report for 2024 (between July and September), 12 764 sexual offences and 10 191 rape cases were reported, all in just three months.
“The silence surrounding these statistics is deafening, perhaps because the lives of women and children are undervalued in South Africa,” said Walter.
“We’d expect an emergency task force … urgent deployment of resources and funding … in cases of misconduct, we demand that police, court officials, and others be held accountable. The missing element is political will. There’s simply no urgency on this matter,” explained Walter.
Educator Lu Simatele, from Girls Against Oppression, agreed: “If you declare it [GBV] a National Disaster, it forces the government to legitimately look at it as an epidemic, legitimately look at it as a disease.”
Simatele said GBV needs to be tackled the same way the covid-19 pandemic was. “You know, for example, when covid-19 hit and they had to declare it a state of emergency, I think very much the same thing has to happen with gender-based violence because we really need to unlock emergency funding …adequate resourcing, multisectoral interventions, coordination, the police, health systems, the justice system, and not only do they need to be adequate, they need to held accountable but at a crisis level of importance and action because it is actually a crisis.”
Speaking about the impact they expect the protest to make Walter said, “If women see our government finally treating GBVF as the emergency it is, it will send a powerful message. You matter. Your life matters. Your voice will be heard, and we believe you. When systems are in place to support and protect, more survivors will come forward.”
FEATURED IMAGE: Women for Change logo. Photo: Supplied
In this episode, “In South Africa our Land”, hosts Sechaba Molete and Lindelwa Khanyile are joined by Mihle Kunju, Law School Council Chairperson, for a conversation about the constitutional promise that “all shall be equal under the law.” While South Africa’s Constitution is celebrated as one of the most progressive in the world, the reality […]
