GALA Queer Archive asks what does it mean to be queer and rooted in African traditions?
GALA Queer Archive held a powerful event to reclaim queer African identity.
The gathering highlighted how strict patriarchal norms, and traditional expectations often silence African queer voices.
Speakers emphasized that queerness has always existed in African societies.
In recognition of Africa Month, the GALA (The Gay and Lesbian Archives) Queer Archive celebrated the International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia, and Transphobia (IDAHOBIT) on May 17 at Breezeblock Café in Brixton, Johannesburg — to re-assert queer African identity and challenge cultural exclusion at Breezeblock Café in Brixton, Johannesburg.
The GALA Queer Archive is an organization located at Wits University that preserves and promotes the history, culture, and experiences of LGBTQIA+ individuals in South Africa through archival collections.
During Africa Month, celebrated annually throughout May (with May 25 as the official date of commemoration in South Africa), the world marked IDAHOBIT as an opportunity for people across the continent to break down barriers.
IDAHOBIT raises awareness about the violence, discrimination, and prejudice faced by queer people worldwide.
Local Setswana handwritten on pink wall translating to: In my neighbourhood, being gay is a gender. Being gay is not being a boy or girl. It’s just being gay. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko
This year’s commemoration focused on unpacking the painful disconnection between queerness and cultural identities in African LGBTQIA+ individuals.
The event discussed how culture shapes the way people live and connect. Traditions like family rituals, community events and ceremonies are meant to bring people together. But for queer individuals, these cultural spaces often do the opposite.
Researcher Nondumiso Lwazi Msimanga (left) reacting positively to panelist Desire Marea (right). Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko
Strict patriarchal rules dominate these traditions. They decide who belongs and who does not based on dress, behaviour and gender roles. As a result, queer voices are often ignored or silenced.
Dr Athinangamso Nkopo, host and moderator of the event, addressed this exclusion by telling Wits Vuvuzela that, “Those of us who are queer and African don’t understand how you can possibly mean that [we exist as] a contradiction.”
Panelist Albert Khoza challenged the myth of queerness as ‘un-African’ by emphasising that African communities had their own understanding of God long before the arrival of missionaries. Similarly, that queerness is not new; it has always existed within African societies.
“Maybe before it wasn’t called ‘queer’. Maybe before it was just a practice. It was looked down upon, but queerness is African. Africa is queer. It’s always been like that,” he said.
Panelist Albert Khoza. Photo : Lukholo Mazibuko
Keval Harie, the executive director of GALA Queer Archive, emphasized that queer individuals continually find unique ways to heal their human experiences and this day serves as another opportunity for such healing.
“We want to create a space where we bring our community together to share experiences in ways that allows us to heal and fight for another day.”
By aligning with Africa Month, this event insisted that queerness has always been part of the continent’s story. Through music, storytelling, traditional food, dress, and dialogue, attendees showcased how culture and queerness are not at odds but are deeply entangled.
From left to right: GALA coordinating team Keval Harie, Dr Athinangamso Nkopo and Kgomotso Kgasi playing Azanian games with an attendee in green sweater. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko Event DJ, Buntu the Ghetto, jamming to beats.
FEATURED IMAGE: Banner of assorted pride flags hanging from GALA Queer Archive emblazed gazebo. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko
South Africa was crowned the country with the most press freedom in Africa after moving up 11 positions this year.
South Africa guarantees media freedom, as indicated by the recent World Press Freedom Day Index.
The 2024 general elections are to owe for the increase in ranking.
Despite improvement, some challenges still need to be addressed.
South Africa climbed the ladder and ranked 27th globally for press freedom, a jump from last year’s 38th ranking, according to the 2025 World Press Freedom Index released on May 2. Earning the top spot in Africa.
The World Press Freedom Index (WPFI) is an annual report, published by Reporters Without Borders (RSF) on World Press Freedom Day, ranking 180 countries according to the degree of freedom available to journalists in the previous year.
The country’s media freedom ranking is identified as ‘satisfactory’.
South Africa’s global media freedom ranking over five years. Graphic : Lukholo Mazibuko
“There is no question that journalists in South Africa work freely across the spectrum,” says Slindile Khanyile, Sanef’s (South African National Editors Forum) media freedom subcommittee chairperson.
But she adds, “Of course, it is not to say that there are no attempts to intimidate or censor them, but these are rare.”
The shift in position is believed to be indicative of the prominent 2024 elections. “I think being able to freely cover the 2024 general elections, which led to a coalition government at national level, for the first time since the dawn of democracy contributed to this,” says Khanyile.
On the elections, Reggie Moalusi, executive director of Sanef, adds, “Fortunately, we saw very few incidents when it comes to journalists being harassed and media freedom transgression where journalists or media houses were not allowed to do their work.”
Despite the progress, Moalusi critiques that the improvement on the mitigation of online harassment among female journalists would positively agitate the country’s ranking, for though the critical importance of media freedom is highlighted in the index, the treatment of journalists should not be overlooked. “There’s still a whole lot more of work that still needs to be done,” he said.
Khanyile also believes that “the continuation of investigative journalism in the public and private sector(s) played a role and contributed to the growth of independent media ownership.”
Waste Land covered by News24’s Sikonathi Manthshantsha and The Laundry by Dewald Van Rensburg of amaBhungane are examples of award-winning investigative series that reflect quality journalism.
Therefore, as Khanyile says, “[The index] reaffirms the country’s commitment to freedom of the press and freedom of expression.”
Artificial intelligence has the power to enhance journalism, but is journalism in more danger because of it?
Amid the chaos of a digital landscape currently being agitated and renovated by generative artificial intelligence, the news industry is no exception to its explosive impact. UNESCO aims to address this at a conference in Brussels on May 7 in commemoration of the 32nd World Press Freedom Day.
World Press Freedom Day takes place annually on May 3 to highlight the press’s current challenges and to raise awareness.
This year, the focus is on ‘Reporting in the Brave New World – the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on press freedom and the media, highlighting the opportunities and challenges that AI has brought to journalism.
Unsurprisingly, generative AI is taking centre stage, as its disruption to the world of technology is too stark to ignore, especially in the news industry.
Principally, we know that news summarises and simplifies information. Broadcasts and articles essentially catch you up on current, recent or ongoing events and weave in analysis or interpretation.
So, does involving AI in this process really pose a threat as a technology that can soak up information in one form, drawing from existing sources to pour the same information into a different mould after?
Yes and no. I believe that anything involving AI means walking a tightrope and, as journalists, falling off that rope means jeopardising the foundation within which journalistic practice is built on — ethics.
A 2025 report by Thomas Reuters Foundation (TRF), paints the nuances of AI use in journalism in the Global South.
It states that 81.7% of journalists already use AI tools like CHATGPT in their journalistic work for drafting and editing content, research, fact-checking and idea generation to save time, reach new audiences and work more efficiently. Starkly, only 13% report using any official AI policy with 79.1% reporting an absence of any clear guidelines.
Of the few non-users, lack of awareness or knowledge of AI tools, insufficient training and support, lack of access to necessary technology, concerns about accuracy and reliability, ethical concerns, preference over traditional methods and fear of job displacement were some of the main reasons for not using AI.
Where newsrooms lack formal guidance and self-education on using AI tools prevails, transparency becomes fragile which is concerning when trust in journalism and the media is already tainted. I am at a crossroads because if AI use is disclosed in news articles, I’m not entirely sure if that would make me trust a news agency more.
That is because I value journalism’s core ethics and skills: original reporting, quality, accuracy, fact-checking and source verification.
Where ethics are concerned, one may question if post-evaluation of AI produced content was done because AI is known to sometimes hallucinate information, supercharging the spread of misinformation. So, as journalism is defined, it still leads as a reliable, fact-checked source of information.
Another ethical concern, as highlighted by The Conversation, is that while journalists may ask for the generation of summaries or idea prompts, sensitive information or copyrighted material is inadvertently uploaded into these public generative AI tools, which not only contravenes company policies but journalistic integrity.
TRF recommends that journalists “understand the ethical implications of AI”. These include “advocating for policies and practices that protect journalistic integrity, while also ensuring fairness and accuracy, and promoting trust with audiences.”
All of this considered, I cannot downplay the ease that AI has brought journalists. It should be welcomed in newsrooms as long as originality and critical thinking isn’t destroyed in the process.
FEATURED IMAGE: Live news broadcast by robot news anchor with breaking news lower thirds and a digital world backdrop. Graphic: Lukholo Mazibuko
The first Obiter Lounge at Wits provided a platform for debate and re-imagination of freedom.
Wits students launched the first-ever Obiter Lounge with raw, unfiltered debate on what freedom really means 31 years into democracy.
Tensions flared as students clashed over gender, power and justice proving freedom is still a battleground in South Africa.
It is a bold space for truth-telling, growth, and uncomfortable but necessary dialogue.
Marking 31 years of democracy in South Africa, the Wits Law Students Council (LSC), hosted their first Obiter Lounge at Solomon Mahlangu House on April 25, 2025, designed as a space created for unfiltered, student-led dialogue.
This is in collaboration with the Wits Moot Society, the Black Lawyers Association Student Chapter (Wits BLA-SC), and the South African Women Lawyers Association (SAWLA).
The event invited students to speak openly about the promises enshrined in South Africa’s Constitution and question whether these are reflected in the daily lives of ordinary citizens.
Lesedi Lekoto, LSC gender and transformation officer opening a new topic for discussion. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko
Initial hesitation gave way to passionate contributions as students reflected on freedom as it relates to race, gender, class, education, and safety. Finger snaps and applause punctuated personal encounters of freedom: from political to academic, economic to social, and from safety to justice.
The turning point of the event came when controversial opinions sparked gasps, murmurs of disbelief, and passionate rebuttals, raising tensions as someone on the floor expressed that that once some black South Africans have been liberated in terms of wealth they isolate themselves from assisting those in lower positions than them, making them the most selfish out there.
This was received with backlash as others critiqued that blaming others for upward social mobility should come with the awareness that many were indoctrinated and fought for their freedom and others reminded the individual that black people must work twice as much to earn half as much and that escaping poverty is the point.
Students attentively listen in as a speaker expresses their thoughts on what freedom means to them. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko
This conversation was exactly what Mihle Kunju, LSC Chairperson, hoped the session to spark, “The main takeaway I envisioned was the creation of tolerance for unpopular but somewhat logical views.”
He believes that it is through uncomfortable and brutal conversation that the country will realise its true purpose.
“The National Dialogue needs to be spearheaded by young people and requires an unwavering commitment to even the most radical ideals”, he said.
Third-year LLB student Mandisa Khathi captured the spirit of the evening: “It has opened my eyes to how much we can learn from one another. Spaces like this that bring people together are truly special.”
She said: “It’s refreshing to meet like-minded people who are as hopeful about the future of South Africa. Plus, it’s a great space for those who might not usually be heard to share their voices.”
The Obiter Lounge has officially set the tone for a new era of student dialogue that is raw, reflective, and urgently necessary.
FEATURED IMAGE: Students gathered in Solomon Mahlangu House for the Obiter Lounge. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko
Despite democracy, inequality remains deeply rooted in South Africa. Colonial-era systems and weak leadership keep many struggling, making true freedom feel like an illusion rather than reality.
South Africans celebrated Freedom Day on April 27, marking 31 years of freedom, but a nation once propelled by the dreams of liberation, finds itself in a paradox where democracy exists in name but fails in practice. The leadership that once embodied conviction and purpose has been replaced by individuals who merely perform the motions of governance without substance. The country’s political landscape reflects a deeper crisis, one rooted in the mechanisms of governmentality and the remnants of colonial power.
Governmentality and the Performance of Power
Scholar, Derek Hook, describes governmentality as a form of power that operates by managing perceptions rather than delivering structural change. By repeatedly acknowledging inequality and promising reforms that take time, leaders create the illusion of progress. This performance encourages citizens to self-regulate, internalise patience, believe change is underway and at times defer their demands of justice.
South African leaders lack the conviction necessary to drive transformative change. They have settled into a comfortable routine of political theatre; reciting the language of democracy and equality while presiding over systems that perpetuate inequality. Nowhere is this more painfully visible than in the education system.
Recent studies highlight persistent educational inequalities. The 2023 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) revealed that well-resourced schools in affluent areas continue to outperform poorly resourced schools in marginalised communities. Basic Education Minister, Siviwe Gwarube acknowledged that, despite post-apartheid reforms, the education system remains highly unequal, with significant disparities in infrastructure, teacher absenteeism and learning outcomes.
A pattern exists where leaders publicly commit to addressing educational inequalities, but the lack of decisive action and effective implementation perpetuates the status quo.
The people, distracted by the spectacle of governance, remain trapped in a system designed to keep power in the hands of the privileged.
Frantz Fanon, one of the most influential thinkers on colonialism and decolonialism, provides critical insights into South Africa’s predicament. In Black Skin, White Masks and The Wretched of the Earth, Fanon explores how colonial rule systematically dehumanises the colonised, stripping them of agency and trapping them in a cycle of psychological inferiority.
Despite South Africa’s political independence, the psychological scars of colonialism continue to shape governance and societal structures. The black mind, conditioned by generations of oppression, has internalised the logic of colonial rule, accepting leadership that fails to challenge existing power dynamics.
The Contradictions of Freedom and Democracy
Freedom in South Africa is often celebrated through constitutional promises; rights to equality, dignity, and movement. Yet, the gap between legal freedom and lived experience is undeniable.
For instance, the right to freedom of expression, particularly in university spaces, is often suppressed by fear. Students hesitate to speak out, fearing institutional retaliation. Recent protests against financial exclusion or poor accommodation conditions are met with resistance, reinforcing the limits of supposed freedoms.
Self-censorship becomes a defence mechanism, a response to the unspoken threat of expulsion or punishment. This psychological fear sustains oppression, ensuring that power remains unchallenged.
As long as fear dictates action, true freedom will remain an illusion. If fear keeps us silent and institutions such as government and universities etc, prioritise self-preservation over real change, can we truly call this freedom?
Wits students are on different pages when it comes to volunteering for nongovernmental organisations.
Wits students actively engage with outreach project tables, taking a break from their studies to explore opportunities and broaden their involvement.
Students voice the benefits and challenges of volunteering, emphasizing its impact on personal growth and mental health.
Over 600 Wits students actively contribute to social justice, embodying the spirit of Ubuntu through volunteerism.
Volunteerism was spotlighted at the NGO Fair on April 10, 2025, hosted by Wits Citizenship Community Outreach (WCCO) on the library lawns. The fair, decorated with close to 30 NGOs, was a call for students to learn about services available and opportunities for volunteering, tutoring, and interning as agents of social change.
Students signing up for volunteer work with Sunshine Association Centre. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko
From foundations advocating for human rights to education on genital health, WCCO’s liaison of the fair, Mabalane Nzapheza said that hosting a fair for NGOs “is a significant event for us as it always allows students and the Wits community to make a positive and impactful contribution to the agenda of social justice”.
While the fair successfully drew a large turnout throughout the day and showcased diverse initiatives, it also sparked a range of perspectives on volunteerism itself —raising questions about its value, accessibility and role in the lives of busy university students.
Shirley Matlala, a third-year biological sciences student, said that volunteering serves as a reminder that a person is more than just their career and can find fulfilment and self-worth in contributing. “You learn more about yourself when volunteering. It really helps you get a feel of other skills that you have outside of math [for example] and it’s just a daily reminder that you are better and more than your career”, she said.
Echoing the sentiment Ntsako Hlahleni, a third-year media studies student said: “I’m a final year student I’ve gotten to a point where my dissertation is coming to an end …and I need something to ground me. I think that I am capable of helping people in certain areas.”
She also expressed that she withheld from volunteering in her previous years because it required way more time than she could offer, a discovery that also made Masande Mfihlo, a third-year Bcom student, stop after first year. This aligns with Karuna Singh’s, manager of WCCO, observations that getting students to be consistent in their volunteering over a long period is more challenging than recruiting them.
Students engaging with outreach project, UNICEF. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko
Faith Shongwe, a fourth-year BA social work student, believes, “Generally, people see volunteering as a waste of time. They realise that ‘Oh, I don’t have the resources and the money to go to those places’, but they don’t understand that it has a greater benefit to them and their livelihoods.” Contributing to NGOs reaching more communities, gaining a social conscience, and achieving social justice are a few of the many benefits of volunteering.
Despite this, volunteerism is still popular at Wits. “The numbers of student volunteers are increasing,” says Singh and Nzapheza proudly remarks on the significant improvement in participation among Witsies this year. “Over 600 active volunteers dedicate their time, skills, and most importantly, humanity, to giving back to society. We witness the spirit of Ubuntu every day”, said Nzapheza.
Praise Sibuyi, a master’s student in social psychological research, pointed out that apprehension towards volunteering sometimes boils down to safeguarding one’s mental health as entering communities that reflect your situation can serve as a trigger.
FEATURED IMAGE: Master’s students Praise Sibuyi and Thami Moropa holding a board cut out of the Ford Foundation, an NGO, alongside one of its volunteers. Photo: Lukholo Mazibuko
Societal expectations and experiences can often place pressure on people’s relationships. With Valentine’s Day coming up we have asked individuals questions about their views on certain relationship dynamics especially when it comes to the most anticipated day of the year for some lovers, Valentines Day. Viewers shared their beliefs and Siyanda and Katlego talk about […]
