SLICE: Don’t look away from the horrors of Apartheid in Palestine 

The oppressive regime of Israel echoes eerily with our own Apartheid history, calling for greater South African solidarity.  

Israel just passed a new law issuing the death penalty for Palestinian political prisoners, revealing a striking resemblance to South Africa’s Apartheid state.   

The systemic erasure of the Palestinian people has been ongoing despite claims of a ‘ceasefire’ in October 2026. In fact, a total of 73, 000 deaths have resulted from Israeli attacks, according to a UN report

Israel’s new death penalty doesn’t just highlight an institutional injustice but also signals an eerie repetition of history.  

Hand-drawn animation of the freedom flotilla. By: Jamie Ho.

“For many years, South Africa had the doubtful honour of being a world leader in the number of judicial executions carried out,” says Deputy Minister Andries Nel. During the period from 1948 to 1994, the country, under the Apartheid regime, utilized the death penalty to suppress the political opposition of black activists.   

Now the same thing is happening in Israel. The death penalty grants the Israeli state the legal authority to kill any Palestinian held in detention, many of whom have never been charged or received a fair trial. Under this mandate, systemic discrimination and genocidal violence will be a part of the Israeli constitution.  

As South Africans, we are no stranger to oppressive regimes; it is a part of our history. And now history is repeating itself. We cannot be complicit.   

As the fleet of over 100 boats from countries all over the world prepares to sail towards Gaza to break Israel’s siege on Palestine, the spirit of international solidarity rings clear.     

The Global Sumud Flotilla is the biggest maritime mission set to disrupt Israel’s siege on Gaza with 3,000 activists sailing from 52 countries, South Africa included. The goal is to break Israel’s blockade, deliver life-saving aid and confront international complicity.   

In the words of Dr Zaheera Soomar, a participant of the Flotilla, “Some moments in history demand more from us than comfort or safety. They demand conscience.”  

Now more than ever, it is necessary to take a stance. Just because we are distant from the conflict doesn’t mean we can’t have an impact.  

Donate to the Global Sumud Flotilla. Boycott pro-Israel organizations. Spread awareness by sharing the message. Don’t forget Palestine.  

EDITORIAL: Journalists win big awards, but who supports newsrooms? 

As South Africa marked the 20th edition of the Taco Kuiper Award for Investigative Journalism on March 27, the spotlight fell on the country’s top investigative reporters. Behind these award-winning stories, however, lies a less visible reality of newsrooms that are under increasing financial pressure and struggling to sustain the very work being honoured.

Jeff Wicks, an investigative journalist at News24, walked away with R200 000, while fellow investigative journalists Pieter-Louis Myburgh of Daily Maverick, Daneel Knoetze of Viewfinder, and John Eligon of The New York Times were named runners-up, each receiving R75 000. 

Their work continues to hold power to account and demonstrate the courage that defines South African journalism. But behind every award-winning story is a newsroom under strain as editors, fact-checkers and institutional support goes somewhat unacknowledged.: 

The Taco Kuiper Award has long celebrated individual brilliance and reinforced the importance of watchdog journalism in a democratic society. But investigative reporting is rarely the work of one person alone. It depends on the resources, time and editorial guidance that only a newsroom can provide.  

Across South Africa, publications are downsizing or closing, advertising revenue is shrinking, and journalists are stretched thinner than ever. For example, Media24, the parent of News24, began consultations in February 2026 to close City Press, placing around two dozen newsroom staff at risk as part of its ongoing restructuring. The 43-year-old publication, which shifted to a digital-only model in 2024, failed to meet commercial expectations. Even digital platforms like News24, which are often held up as success stories, survive by absorbing talent and resources from declining print operations rather than from stable and well-funded growth.  

This raises a critical question: while journalists are rewarded for excellence, who supports the environments that make such work possible? Recognising individuals without addressing the structural conditions of their workplace risks overlooking the challenges that threaten the future of investigative journalism.  

Awards like the Taco Kuiper could evolve to reflect this reality, not by replacing individual recognition, but by expanding it to include newsroom support. This could take the form of grants for investigative teams, mentorship programs for emerging journalists, or formal recognition of editors and fact-checkers who make such reporting possible. 

Celebrating great journalism is important but so is sustaining it. As we applaud Jeff Wicks and his peers, we must also ask: who celebrates the newsrooms that make their stories possible? Without these institutions, the brilliance we honour risks being an exception rather than the norm. 

SLICE: Chalamet or Jordan, who will take home the best actor award at the 2026 Oscars? 

The annual Academy awards will finally settle the public’s burning need to know who will win the best actor category.  

The 2026 Oscars Best Actor race has turned into a blockbuster showdown between Timothée Chalamet in Marty Supreme and Michael B. Jordan in Sinners. We have reached this point, because both dropped jaw-dropping performances, with Chalamet channelling a wild ping-pong hustler under Josh Safdie’s gritty lens, his third Oscar nomination after Call Me by Your Name and A Complete Unknown. Jordan slays dual roles in Sinners as vampire-hunting twins facing 1930s racism in Ryan Coogler’s epic film. 

Jordan has got serious momentum after snagging the Actors Award formally known as the Screen Actors Guild Award for Best Actor. He won over Chalamet, Leonardo DiCaprio in One Battle After Another, and Ethan Hawke in Blue Moon. The Actors Award’s are purely voted by actors, who make up the Academy’s biggest voting group. That love from his peers could tip the scale big time when it comes to the Oscar’s.  

Not helping Chalamet’s Oscar campaign is his recent comment about some of the most respected art forms of all time, ballet and opera. At a Variety-CNN event, he said “no one cares about” ballet or opera anymore, “with much respect,” sparking backlash from Whoopi Goldberg, Doja Cat, and arts advocates. The timing couldn’t be worse for the Oscar hopeful.  This taking place during the peak of his Oscars campaign is horrible timing.  

Chalamet messed up by disrespecting culturally significant art forms. Many fans were outraged and disappointed by his comments as well as confused, because his mother and sister are both trained ballet dancers.  

The Oscars is no stranger to an intense battle within their categories. In 2005, Jamie Foxx and DiCaprio had a similar battle for their performances in Ray and The Aviator respectively, where everyone was waiting on the edge of their seats to know who would win.  

Truth is, both gave powerful performances. Chalamet’s determination was felt through the screen, Jordan’s ability to play two convincingly different “cousins” – jaw dropping. And not to mention the other great actors in this category DiCaprio, Hawke and Wagner Moura performed brilliantly in their own right.  

Whoever grabs the gold on March 16, 2026, between Chalamet or Jordan (or if it is a complete curveball), it’s a win for great acting either way. 

EDITORIAL: Lesufi fails to address blackouts

On Monday, February 23, Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi delivered the State of the Province Address (SOPA) at the Nesrec Expo Centre. It is unfortunate that he did not come well prepared to address the electricity issues currently challenging residents in this province.   

Yes, the minister of electricity has put an end to nationwide load shedding. However, what are his plans for the ongoing blackouts? The stations are constrained, there are illegal connections, cable theft, the infrastructure is old, we have heard of these reasons and need solutions that will last. Renaming the problem is not solving it. Blackouts are even worse as they are unplanned and last for days on end.  

We saw the headlines regarding the recovered R3 million worth of cooper cables. Premier, why did you not give us a detailed strategy on how you plan to prevent this cable theft from happening again? Strong security measures need to be implemented at cable theft hotspots. The people of Gauteng deserve to spend the electricity they pay for without paying extra for generators, solar, gas appliances, data and fast foods.  

There were no funds allocated to fixing the old substations and transformers in our province, which are also reasons for the constant trips in electricity supply. Out of the 15 investments he mentioned, from water reservoirs to houses and fast trains, not one investment was allocated to this problem.  

City Power in Johannesburg has been screaming “systems constrained due to rising population.” Where are the plans to address this overpopulation within the province as it is one of the major factors affecting our power supply.  

The project of turning recyclable waste into energy could really benefit us. As it is currently being done in Bushbuckridge, Mpumalanga, it has proven both profitable and reliable. It would be like killing two birds with one stone as we also struggle with land pollution in Johannesburg. 

As we look forward to the upcoming SOPA debates, we expect this shortcoming to be addressed in the house.

SLICE: Maintenance day costs an arm and a leg

The pressure of the beauty maintenance day is piling up and emptying the pockets of many.  

There was a time when “beauty maintenance” meant styling your hair and maybe getting it trimmed before school picture day. That was all that was required of you. Now? The expectations for women in particular feel endless – lashes, nails, hair, waxing, eyebrow shaping, facials, wig installs – the list just keeps growing. What used to be simple personal grooming has evolved into a full-time job, that requires a whole day off.  

Let me be clear: personal grooming is important. Looking after yourself can boost your confidence, self- esteem, improve hygiene, and contribute to your overall self-care. There is nothing wrong with wanting to feel put together. However, somewhere along the way, beauty maintenance stopped being about feeling good and started feeling like a requirement. 

A full “maintenance day” for me can easily cost up to R1500. That’s a significant amount of money to spend. Between work, transport, and everyday expenses, budgeting for lashes and nails every few weeks isn’t always realistic. Social media and societal pressures can make beauty maintenance feel necessary. 

Braamfontein and Johannesburg CBD has a huge selection of beauty salons and maintenance spots. On almost every corner there are nails, brows, or hair services on offer. The options are endless, but unfortunately, the quality isn’t always guaranteed. Many students have experienced rushed appointments, unprofessional service, or results that don’t match the price paid. 

The bigger issue, though, is the societal pressure attached to it all. When i walk into a lecture hall and the majority of people have their nails done and frontals installed, it makes me feel like I do not fit in. There is this unspoken expectation that to be “put together,” you must have your lashes done, nails fresh, edges laid, and brows perfectly shaped. And for young women, especially myself, navigating identity and confidence, that pressure can weigh heavy. 

I think beauty regiments should be about self-expression, self-care and evoke joy. They should make you happy, not anxious about keeping up with the trends. It should feel like self-love, not a compulsory checklist, added onto your budget. 

So, before you book your next appointment, do it because you genuinely love how it makes you feel, not because it’s trending.  

EDITORIAL: Johannesburg water crisis points out chronic mismanagement

Johannesburg’s water crisis is heavily restricting the daily lives of citizens. 

For the past month, the City of Johannesburg has been struggling with a water crisis that has exposed serious cracks within local governance and infrastructure. What started off as a short outage has now spiralled out of control.  

Residents have been frustrated by the lack of water services across Johannesburg the city. From Melville, Westdene, Parktown west and Emmarentia, some residents have gone more than 20 days without water.  

Johannesburg can not claim to be a world- class African city, while its residents are standing in queues at water tanks for over three weeks. This lack of service delivery is inhumane. Water is a basic need, and the municipality needs to ensure at that this service is delivered to all residents efficiently. 

Volunteers in Melville have organised communal water tanks with strict limits per household simply to ensure survival. For elderly residents and families with small children, the daily act of securing water has become exhausting. 

Frustration has spilt onto the streets as peaceful protests are being carried out. Protests have erupted in Melville. Residents are angry at the lack of urgency shown by the government. All the while, some are missing school, work, being put through unhygienic conditions and emotional stress.  

City officials point to ageing infrastructure, pressure management systems, maintenance backlogs and lack of coordination with Rand Water as part of the problem. The Government has announced intervention plans and committees aimed at stabilising the water supply. But for residents living day to day without running water, these long-term strategies offer little immediate relief.  

The lack of planning and leadership is now being highlighted as residents are being impacted. The city of Johannesburg must move pass crisis management and implement sustainable and reliable service delivery.  

When taps begin to run dry, this is an indication that governance has failed and South African citizens have to now pay the price.  

EDITORIAL: South Africans continue to ask “what’s in a name?”

South Africa is again debating the name changes of provinces and towns. 

Over the past month, there has been nationwide debate over the name changes of various towns and provinces. This puts into question South Africa’s history and if we should preserve the current names as a reminder or change them to honour our heritage. 

Name changes carry real and expensive costs. The updating of maps, road signs, business branding and tourism material require funding and resources that could be used elsewhere. The country has a multitude of more pressing issues – such as a high unemployment rate, and water and electricity shortages- changing the names of provinces and towns shouldn’t be the top priority for the current economic climate of South Africa. 

The Eastern Cape’s is currently undergoing a massive transformation on this front. Gayton McKenzie , the Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture, approved 21 geographical name changes, including renaming East London to KuGompo and Graaff-Reinet to Robert Sobukwe Town. This has been in line with public consultations and recommendations made from the South African Geographical Names Council.   

The name changes are yet to be confirmed as it is the department’s ongoing commitment to ensure that the names highlight the country’s diverse heritage and history. Most residents in Eastern Cape are against the name changes highlighting that the towns historical identity and heritage should remain, as this keeps history intact.  

Other residents argue that the changes are long overdue, as the original names are reminiscent of our history and it is important to keep reminders around, so that people do not forget. The renaming project can be viewed as a form of decolonialisation and reclaiming our history and instilling pride over the South African landscape.  

King Misuzulu kaZwelithini recently reignited the debate by calling for the removal of “Natal”, from the provincial name “KwaZulu- Natal”, he argues that before colonial efforts the area was simply called KwaZulu. The Zulu king is pleading with politicians to broaden the public debate about these historical boarders as they have been shaped by colonial authorities.  

The African National Congress (ANC) has responded cautiously, particularly around the proposals to rename KwaZulu-Natal, stressing that it has not yet adopted an official position on the matter. The party emphasised that any provincial name changes must follow proper constitutional and legal processes. 

As the debate continues, we need to critically ask ourselves what impact the name changes will have on the community, whether positive or negative, it will be the residents that deal with the massive changes, and their opinion is of high importance. 

EDITORIAL: Acting Minister Firoz Cachalia has called citizens for back up 

Numbers of illegally owned guns fuelling gun violent crimes are currently outrageous, but there is hope. 

The admission of a lack of capacity to tackle organised crime in the Western and Eastern Cape provinces by the Acting Minister of Police, Firoz Cachalia, shook many people. 

While their surprise can be credited to many factors, one outstanding reason is that most South Africans are used to being gaslit and have become accustomed to it, as a result fail to recognise the first step in problem solving- acknowledging one exists. 
 
The Democratic Alliance (DA) rejected the minister’s admission, claiming it is an excuse and equates to surrendering the office’s duty to protect its people.  

They further pointed the office of the minister has had years to plan against gang crimes, yet underfunding, weak intelligence, and poor prosecution have fuelled gangs to terrorise people and businesses. 
 
The DA and Cachalia are, in fact, in agreement when it comes to the reasons the Department of Police has been failing to end organised crime. 
 
While there are internal problems within the policing system such as: the physical filing system, corruption, police officers not reporting lost or stolen guns- the Minister called for better policing during the eleventh edition of the National Excellence Awards for police officers. 

The above needs to work hand in hand with active citizens to lower the rate of organised crime in South Africa. 
 
According to Gideon Joubert of SA Gun Owners Association, there is about three to six million unlicensed firearms in circulation nationally. This contributes to the rising crime levels and makes it difficult to trace perpetrators as the guns either do not have serial numbers, or the serial numbers that are found on the gun belong to some civilian who lost it and did not report. 
 
Last month, Clay Taylor, a gun-free SA researcher, suggested that guns need to be recovered. Lost or stolen guns need to be brought back into the licensing system. 

To help with this, citizens are urged to report lost or stolen guns. So far, 22 guns per day are reported missing by civilians and two firearms are reported missing or stolen in the police department per day.  

These numbers are not matching the overall numbers of guns circulating across the country in illegal hands. That means there are people – police and citizens – not reporting their lost or stolen guns. 
 
South Africa belongs to all who live in it and all who live in it ought to play a part in keeping it safe and crime free. Report illegal firearms to the South African Police service (SAPS) by calling 08600 10111 or using the MySAPS App. 

SLICE: A newcomers guide to conquering the Wits edge! 

Being a first-year can conjure up a rollercoaster of emotions, and navigating it can turn survival into belonging.

The moment my parents’ car disappeared down the road outside my residence four years ago, reality hit me. Standing there in a new place, surrounded by unfamiliar faces and unpacked boxes, I felt a knot in my stomach and my chest tightened with anxiety. It was bittersweet watching them leave, I felt a mixture of both excitement and fear settling in all at once. As shy as I was, I knew this was an opportunity of a lifetime. 

Around me, students laughed as their parents helped them carry boxes upstairs, rooms and corridors buzzed with conversation, and new friendships seemed to form effortlessly. I knew no one. I kept questioning if I truly belonged here. I did not realise then, what I know now, which is that almost everyone around me was feeling the exact same way I did.  Even in my loneliness, I promised myself that I would make the most out of this experience. 

Walking onto the Wits University campus for the first time can be both exciting and terrifying. Your first year at Wits represents a sense of freedom and possibility, but also pressure and uncertainty, this marks the beginning of a journey that will test you in ways you never expected.  

Wits is more than just attending lectures and keeping up with submission deadlines. Outside of classes you will quickly come to realise that this university has so much more to offer. Whether you are grabbing something to munch on at the Matrix, sitting on the Lawns with your new formed friends, or doing the occasional people-watching on the Great Hall steps, these spaces become the heart of student life on main campus.  

Hundreds of events are hosted by various clubs and societies and pop- up performances are frequent; this is to remind you that Wits is a community, as much as an academic space. Ensure that you get involved as it will help make campus feel less stressful and more like home.  

Speaking of stress, the change from high school to university is drastic and this can be overwhelming. No one is here to remind you of deadlines or check if you are keeping up academically, it is important that you take agency over your own life. First year is not about being perfect, it is about learning how to manage your time efficiently to avoid unnecessary stress later on.  

Making friends can be tricky, campus is constantly busy and it is easy to feel alone in the crowd, as was I upon arrival. People might seem like they have it together, but they are silently navigating the confusion and anxiety just as you are. Do not be afraid to talk to the person sitting next to you in a lecture or ask questions in tutorials, you would be surprised how many people feel exactly the way you do.  

As the year continues, it is important to know where you can seek out help. Wits offers academic development units such as the Wits Writing Centre, tutors, and libraries that are there to support you. Make use of these facilities early on, there is no shame in seeking help.  

Take care of your overall wellbeing, The Campus Health and Wellness Centre (CHWC) and the Counselling and Careers Development Unit (CCDU) are there to support students with their physical and mental health.  

First year will test you, you might fail a test, or question whether you belong or not. Do not give up, keep showing up and take it one day at a time.  

Oh and remember, once a Witsie always a Witsie!   

EDITORIAL: The Vanderbijlpark is tragedy compounded

The Vanderbijlpark scholar transport accident exposes how reckless driving and weak enforcement continue to cost lives on South Africa’s roads.  

On Monday, January 19, a scholar transport minibus was involved in a devastating collision in Vanderbijlpark, situated south of Johannesburg. The tragic accident resulted in fourteen fatalities, sending shockwaves through Gauteng and the country at large.  

As investigations continue, the 22-year-old driver appeared before the Vanderbijlpark Magistate’s Court, where the case took a drastic turn as he abandoned bail and additional charges were added. The National Prosecuting Authority confirmed on Thursday, January 22, that the driver, Ayanda Dludla, now faces 14 counts of murder, upgraded from the initial charges of culpable homicide. Other charges include three counts of attempted murder, one count of driving without a valid permit and one count of operating an unlicensed vehicle.  

Initial reports and video footage point to reckless driving during peak traffic. Too often, scholar transports operate in a grey area where unroadworthy vehicles, missing permits and unqualified drivers are treated as a miner issue, rather than a life-threatening risk for the lives of people on the road.   

The tragedy that unfolded in Vanderbijlpark is not just a heartbreaking reminder of how dangerous our roads have become; it is an indication of the disappointing system that has repeatedly failed to protect even its most vulnerable users. For years, communities and road safety advocates have warned about reckless driving and weak enforcement from road officials.  

The Department of Transport’s recent push to verify scholar transport operators, to ensure proper registration and the possession of valid documentation, is crucial. This raises an uncomfortable question: why did it take the loss of fourteen young lives for this urgency? Road stops after such a tragedy are not enough, enforcement must be consistent and uncompromising, not just reactive.  

Scholar transport drivers are entrusted with young lives, and that responsibility needs discipline, patience and respect for the rules of the road. Reckless overtaking, speeding and a complete disregard for traffic laws are acts of negligence with inevitably devastating consequences.  

Parents and community members should be empowered to play a role and verifying whether a scholar vehicle is properly registered, checking operating permits, and refusing to use services that cannot prove the above should be normalised. Communities should feel supported and not intimidated or discouraged when reporting unsafe drivers.  

The way forward requires more than apologies and condolences. It demands stricter enforcement, routine vehicle inspections and serious consequences. The Vanderbijlpark tragedy must mark a turning point for South Africans. Our children deserve to travel safely to and from school, anything else is a failure we can no longer accept. 

Investigations into the accident are ongoing and the case has been postponed to March 5, 2026. 

SLICE: A better future, but only if you can afford it

A new amendment to the National Credit Act could see students with debt blacklisted as soon as they graduate.

On August 13, 2025, the Minister of Trade and Industry, Parks Tau, submitted draft amendments to the National Credit Act, proposing that educational institutions may report student debt to credit bureaus. If passed, this would mean that graduates could be blacklisted for their debt. Public comment is open until September 12, 2025.

At first glance, this policy looks like accountability. But in reality, it is yet another tool that widens South Africa’s already staggering inequality gap. For wealthy families, paying university fees is not a burden. For the poor, especially the Black majority, it is another chain tying us down.

South Africa is already split in two: those who have, and those who struggle to survive. Instead of building bridges, the ruling party seems determined to burn them down, shutting off access and any chance to ever cross that bridge. The Afircan National Congress continues to oppress young people, creating more obstacles than opportunities. Instead of uplifting us, they are burying us deeper under the weight of policies that do not understand our lived realities.

Not every student has parents who can afford fees for tertiary education. Those who manage through bursaries and student loans, then graduate into an economy that demands work experience for jobs, while internships often pay next to nothing. The lucky few who evade unemployment through entry-level jobs can earn as little as R5000 a month. How must that cover rent, food, transport, and other essentials, and still stretch to settle student debt?

This amendment doesn’t simply manage debt, it weaponises it. It tells young South Africans that their dreams of education come with a punishment clause. That, unless you are privileged, your qualification is a curse that follows you into every financial decision, from applying for a job to renting a flat.

Are our leaders truly this blind? Or are they deliberately working against the success of young South Africans? Each new barrier makes it harder to believe they care.

But we are not powerless. The public has until September 12, 2025, to oppose this amendment. Send your comments to credit@thedtic.gov.za

Raise your voice, share your story, and remind those in power that the future of this country depends on its youth.

To the politicians who continue to oppress us: we will meet you at the ballot box.

EDITORIAL: How to tell when your country is under the weather

South Africa is clearly unwell, and it is our duty as her citizens to demand treatment before it’s too late.

As of April 2025, the new South Africa is officially 31 years old. She is the answer to our forebearers’ prayers, the jewel in Africa’s crown and home to the genesis of humanity. However, it would be nearly impossible to expect her to be fine when her daughters are dying on the regular, the multicultural colours of her rainbow are dull and her leaders decide to pimp her out. 

In a perfect world, we as citizens elect leaders we believe are best suited to take care of our country’s health and wellbeing – and in turn our own. Unfortunately, we do not live in a perfect world, and we are impacted by bad decisions made behind closed doors. Decisions that often compound the symptoms of our 31-year-old’s health. Nursing our patient cannot be left to those with access to power alone, we need to be active caretakers too.

Here’s how to tell when your country is under the weather:

https://www.tiktok.com/@anton.taylor/video/7487133527243312390

In mid June 2025, the Hawks raided South African comedian and Tiktoker Anton Taylor’s home with the signoff of judge C.A Erasmus and the instruction of suspended police minister Senzo Mchunu. This raid was a result of a satirical video Taylor posted in March 2025. Taylor pretended to be a Czech criminal in cahoots with Minister Senzo Mchunu and the police department as a means to continue with his various criminal dealings with no legal repercussions. Taylor’s  case was eventually dismissed,  however this is a prime example of authoritarianism. The right to freedom of expression is guaranteed under Section 16 of the Constitution. This incident is an alarming symptom because it reflects a government ministers willingness to infringe of the rights of South African citizens because his feelings were hurt by a satirical video.

Gender-based violence is a  major issue in the country. Africa Check’s most recent report details that of the 6953 murders between October to December 2024, 961 of these were women which equates to 10 to 11 South African women being killed per day. These statistics are not inclusive of the many South African women who are being physically and sexually assaulted at the hands of men daily. Our nation’s soil cannot absorb the blood of innocent women every day and be expected to produce an abundance of anything good. The most recent South African Police Service Report indicates that from 2023 to 2024, 42 569 cases of rape were reported in South Africa which equates to over 116 incidents of rape daily. If the blood she is covered in is not convincing, then listen to the cries of her children.

When she was 11 in 2005, the rand to dollar exchange rate was approximately R6,35 to the dollar.  During that time, she had an unemployment rate of 26,5%. Ten years later at 21 in 2015, the rand sat at  approximately R12,73 to the dollar. She recorded unemployment rates of 24.5% by the end of the  fourth quarter that year. Now at 31, the rand to the dollar exchange rate sits at R 17,87 to the dollar, with an unemployment rate of 33.2% by the second quarter of 2025. The progression of all these figures demonstrate that South Africa is not a strong as she used to be. She is unable to interact with her peers  in ways she previously could. She is further weakened by our government officials and entrepreneurs  who use her resources to build personal compounds in Nkandla, procure palatial mansions in Constantia and build R12million homes in Waterfall. She is at the mercy of pimps who travel in blue light convoys and routinely sell her to the highest bidder for their gain.

She does not look or behave like a country that has gold, diamonds, chromium, coal, iron ore, rodium, platinum, palladium and manganese. She does not shine like the stars she’s produced globally in sports, art, fashion and academia. She’s lost her shine and her leaders have no answers for her children.

Through rising unemployment, gender-based violence and poverty statistic we’ve become desensitised to the reality of our situation. In the words of Sir Francis Bacon, “knowledge is power”. Now that you’ve been alerted to the signs of an unhealthy nation, it’s time we act and plan ways to bring her back to vitality like our lives depend on it, because they do.


FEATURED IMAGE: Sechaba Molete, 2025 Wits Vuvuzela Journalist. Photo: File/Paul Botes

RELATED ARTICLES: