Officially named, but culturally unchanged: The Matrix at Wits

A signage change at Wits University highlights the student centre’s official name, but “The Matrix” remains the name that defines campus culture.

  • The student centre at Wits University now displays its official name in full, Student Union Building Matrix.
  • Many students were unaware of the formal name and have always called it “The Matrix.”
  • Despite the signage, “The Matrix” remains a key part of Wits student culture.

Something felt off at the university’s student centre, something felt strange. The bold, familiar “Matrix” signage that has long marked the heart of student life was gone. In its place was a more formal name: “Student Union Building Matrix.” For many students passing through, the change raised a quiet but lingering question—had “The Matrix” been renamed?

At first glance, it appeared to be a rebrand. But conversations across campus revealed that the story is less about a new name and more about how students experience and define their space.

Many students had not noticed the updated signage at all. Others only became aware of it after it was pointed out.

An image of the map of the Matrix and the Student Union Building. Photo Provided by: Jenna Stelli

“I’ve been at Wits for quite a while, and it’s always just been ‘The Matrix’ to me,” said Obakeng Leping, a fourth-year BSc civil engineering student.

Head of marketing Reshma Lakha-Singh said the official name of the building has always been Student Union Building, with “The Matrix” becoming widely used from 2001. The name gained popularity due to its catchy nature, influenced by both the building’s structure and the release of the movie by the same name at the same time.

“The decision to revert to the original name aligns with the university’s signage and wayfinding policy, which aims to ensure consistency, clarity, and uniformity across campus buildings as budgets allow,” said Lakha-Singh. “The current naming better reflects the building’s long-standing formal identity and institutional purpose.”

Jenna Stelli of campus planning added that the facility consists of two separate buildings. “The original Student Union building is to the south and the more recent Matrix building to the north. Because the building is experienced as one cohesive hub, we decided to include both names on the new signage to avoid confusion,” she said. “There haven’t been any official name changes — we are ensuring the signage matches how the building is used.”

The gap between official naming and everyday language reveals something deeper about student identity at Wits. Names are not only assigned; they are shaped over time through shared experience.

For students like Tiyane Matsheke, a third-year BA general student, the informal name carries a sense of belonging. “I’ll still call it ‘The Matrix’ because that’s what everyone knows. It’s part of Wits culture,” she said.

Attempts to trace the origins of the name remain unclear, with key sources unavailable to comment. Yet its meaning is evident in how firmly it is held by students.

Even as official branding becomes more visible, it is unlikely to redefine what the space represents. The signage may read differently, but in conversation, memory and daily student life, “The Matrix” continues to hold its place.

FEATURED IMAGE: Picture of the Student Union Building Matix. Photo by: Sanele Sithole

RELATED STORIES:

Art beyond borders—redefining how we see migration

The Atlas of Uncertainty offers a profound perspective on African migration, redefining our understanding of belonging.  

Picture of papier-mâché boat sculpture entitled ‘Mashuna and Hakuna nija’ by artist Onys Martin.  
Photo: Jamie Ho. 

The Atlas of Uncertainty exhibition opened at the Wits Origins Centre on Saturday, April 18, inviting visitors to question the current agenda around migration, urbanisation and belonging in Africa.  

From a paper-mâché boat constructed from receipts to a woven tapestry stitched with burlap, the exhibition offers a more humanising lens for viewing the global phenomenon of mobility: not as burdensome, but as inherent to humanity.  

Rooted in three African cities, Johannesburg, Accra, and Nairobi, the Atlas looks beyond the borders that divide us. Migration researcher Loren B. Landau highlights that the current scholarship neglects to capture the complexities of Africa, thereby revealing a need to move “from the counting to the feeling; from the census to the senses.” 

To understand the vast complexities that define the continent, the Atlas is not only working across borders, but across different media, disciplines, platforms and ways of thinking. Urban sociologist Caroline Wanjiku Kihato explains that this “lets different ways of knowing sit alongside one another, without forcing them into a single voice.” 

The Atlas of Uncertainty is a powerful revision of how we understand African cities. It uproots mainstream narratives surrounding migration, opening the space up for uncomfortable yet necessary conversations.  

Spatial practitioner, Carina Kanbi provides some insight into the actual making of the project and how its themes of migratory politics were mirrored over the course of its conception.  

Going all the way back to 2023, when the project first began, she notes challenges faced by the artists working across borders, not only in physically transporting the works, but also in handling bureaucratic restrictions between countries. “The exhibition did not begin this morning,” she explains. “It very much began in transit.” 

And staying true to this theme of mobility, the Atlas will remain a piece of art that will remain in perpetual movement. While it is on exhibition until July 3 at the Origins Centre, it is also planned to showcase in Accra and Nairobi in 2027.  

Each piece of the Atlas reverberates with the passion of its creators. Each tassel holds weight. 

Each shard aches with feeling. As the cracks of division deepen in our world, the value of this exhibit lies not only in its ability to challenge the status quo, but in its ability to reach where data and statistics cannot, to reconnect with our ability to be human. 

Close-up of ‘A Map of Dreams and Realities’ by Billie McTernan. Photo: Jamie Ho.

Wits staff unions say they are ready to down tools

A protracted bargaining process has reached a stalemate, which may grind activities on campus to a halt. 

On Monday, April 20, National Education, Health and Allied Workers’ Union (Nehawu) and the Administrative, Library and Technical Staff Association (Altsa) members took matters into their own hands by picketing in and around campus.  

Union members, made up of professional and administrative staff, marched from the Great Hall to Wits Science Stadium, after declining the 4,95% salary increase proposed by Wits University management.  

According to the Altsa union secretary, Tholane Khiba, meetings with the vice chancellor and senior executive team resulted in a proposed 4,95% increase, which was rejected and led to the deadlock. “Looking at the delay, the members are now getting frustrated,” he said.  

In a statement, the senior executive team said the matter, in month eight of “protracted negotiations”, was heard at the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) last week, but the offer made by the university was rejected.  

Nehawu Regional Secretary of greater Johannesburg, Tumisho Madihlaba, stated that “the members in their big numbers for both unions Altsa and Nehawu have agreed. We are not accepting the 5%, we are not accepting the 1% on Annual Performance Incentive… We are going on strike!” 

Nehawu and Altsa members gathered by the Great Hall for a mass meeting. Photo: Jamie Ho.

 Thabo Modise the Nehawu branch secretary of Wits said they have worked in the best interest of the university, but feel “financially bullied.”

As a result, they plan to down their tools. “We also have a muscle comrades. The muscle that we have is our labour. We are going to withdraw our labour and show them how important we are,” Modise added.  

The members of the union emphasise that they will stand in unity until their demands are met. Altsa acting president, Jordan Sake, stated “we have rejected that nonsense from management. That insult? We will not take it.”  

Members of both unions highlighted the growing cost of living amid global conflicts as one of the reasons they are pushing for more money. Jabulile Maseko, a member of Altsa said, “it is not enough, everyone is aware that everything is going up.” 

While tensions continue, demonstrations and strike action seem to be on the horizon as both unions stand their ground with their demands.  

Joburg’s CBD came alive in first Main Street Sundays

Main Street in Johannesburg transformed into a car-free zone, inviting people to take back the city centre through art, community, cycling and music.  

On Sunday, April 12, Johannesburg reimagined how we can experience the city. What is usually jammed with traffic, became a space for walking, cycling, art and connection. The initiative was led by Jozi My Jozi in partnership with Young Urbanists. For one full day Main Street in Marshalltown was closed to motor vehicles and belonged to the people.   

There was something happening on every corner. Music played, book clubs met in the open, art filled the streets, people skated, played games and searched the stalls. It was more than just a street closure, it was a reclaiming of public space from cars.  

“Our mission is to bring people back to the city,” said Jozi My Jozi Education Workstream Coordinator, Senty Maphosa. “Let’s relove, let’s reimagine what the city could look like.”  

Globally, cars dominate 80% of public space. But as Thandile Manyifolo, BA Architecture Student and Deputy Chairperson of the Jozi My Jozi Chapter at Wits University reminds us, “urban spaces were designed for people to live in. If people come secondary to that, are they really fulfilling their purpose?”   

Organisers emphasised that reclaiming the streets is not just about daytime activities but also creating more opportunities and innovation for young people into the evenings. 

The event offered a glimpse into how urban space can return to being people centric. Children played freely, with a programme created in partnership with Play Africa, the day included interactive learning activities, face painting, chalk art, sports and a gallery.  

People felt at ease, walking around taking photos on their phones, dancing and laughing.  There was a sense of belonging. “Today is all about community, it’s all about collaboration and it’s all about bringing back a sense of pride and inspiring people,” said Maphosa.  

Inspired by cities including Bogotá, Paris and Cape Town’s Bree Street. The event is part of a larger experiment to revitalise the city, reimagine the use of urban space and see what happens when streets are closed to cars and given to pedestrians.  

For Johannesburg, Main Street Sundays was the first of what many hope will become a regular event. “We are starting something that will have a domino effect in the long term to open up the streets of Jozi, not just Main Street, but the entirety of the city,” said Manyifolo.   

It showed us what Joburg can feel like, where the city is not just a place to quickly pass through, but one where we can come together, connect and move safely. 

Between a tight buget and a war, Witsies in a pinch

Rising fuel costs are forcing Wits students to choose between paying for their daily commute and basic essentials like meals and data

Two weeks after South Africa’s fuel increase, some Wits University students who commute daily say rising transport costs are already affecting their ability to attend lectures, manage time, and meet basic living expenses.  

According to Bloomberg, petrol is currently around R 23 per litre, following recent increases in global oil prices and local fuel adjustments.

Fuel price adjustments on April 1, 2026 saw petrol increase by R3,06 per litre and diesel prices rise by up to R7, 51, according to the South African National Taxi Council (SANTACO).  

While the increase in fuel prices continues to place pressure on household budgets, its impact has now extended directly into the public transport costs.  

The National Taxi Alliance (NTA) confirmed that taxi fares have already increased by R6 per trip. For daily commuters, this translates into an estimated additional R12 per day for a return trip, about R60 per week, and roughly R240 per month. 

A Wits student passing their taxi fare to the front of the vehicle. Photo: Alice Dhlamini

For students who rely on taxis from the surrounding areas, the increase has turned daily travel into a financial strain.  

“I live off campus in Benoni, and I have to travel every day to get to class,” says Afrika Mbangiso, an honours in Psychology student.

“From Wanderers Taxi Rank in Johannesburg, I have to walk the rest of the way to Wits just to save money for lunch or sometimes, for my trip back home,” Mbangiso adds.

It has also affected her punctuality and workload. “I am sometimes late for class, meaning it’s more work that I must catch up on later”, she adds. For students like her, longer commutes and additional walking reduce time for rest, studying, and academic preparation. 

Nontobeko Zulu, a Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) student, argues that the increase has forced what she calls a “displacement of funds”. “For many of us, these aren’t just transport fares, they represent a radical displacement of funds,” Zulu says.  

NSFAS turns hope into hunger for thousands of students

The fund set up to save students leaves many students begging for assistance.

As the second block of the semester begins at Wits University, some NSFAS beneficiaries are not only worried about academic pressures but also about survival. Awaiting allowances has made students anxious about where their next meal will come from and the possibility of being locked out of their residences. 

The National Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) has gone to shambles. On March 30 2026, the Auditor-General issued a “disclaimer opinion” due to systemic issues that left their books unverified.  

The findings revealed funds being paid to over 822 deceased students, 14,000 wealthy ineligible beneficiaries, while legitimate beneficiaries are left to starve, and thousands of fraudulent recipients are benefiting from the fund. The systematic collapse and mismanagement of documents result in hungry students facing possible eviction.  

 “In the beginning of the year there are four to five funding lists, your name not being on the list means you will not receive an allowance and in that time you have to rely on your family or see for yourself until your name is on the list,” Tariana Botha, a Wits alumni, holds a BA in Psychology and Geography and is now pursing her BA Honours in Psychology, commented, 

Perfect Maphumulo, a first-year mining engineering student, shared that his cousin had to borrow money after not receiving his allowance, “He called home and told them he didn’t receive his allowance. His parents had to go borrow money.”  

Although some students remain silent about the delay of allowances, they remain hopeful. Waiting for a bank notification with their allowance, the wait is mentally daunting and affects the academics of many students.  

The Wits Student Representative Council (SRC) has been making efforts to fill the gaps left by NSFAS through the SRC Access Fund, supported by the university.  “NSFAS should be dissolved, and the Department of Higher Education should directly work with universities, and the university should directly work and communicate with the eligible recipients,” Wits SRC President Gilbert Nchabeleng said. The SRC stands with students and continues to fight for them. Until NSFAS is rebuilt and restructured, students will continue to anxiously wait for an allowance.

Questions raised over access as student photographers miss graduation opportunities

Student photographers at Wits University raise concerns over being denied the opportunity to work during graduation season after missing an accreditation deadline they claim was not clearly communicated.

Over the past two weeks, Wits University Campus has been filled with celebrations as graduates marked a significant milestone. For many, taking photos at iconic locations such as the Great Hall has become a tradition. However, this year, some students were forced to make alternative arrangements after unaccredited photographers were denied access.

The university introduced a system requiring photographers to obtain permits to operate during the graduation period. A limited number of registered photographers were allowed to work in designated outdoor public areas, while Campus Protection Services (CPS) removed those without permits.

According to the Examination and Graduation Office (EGO), the application process was posted on the university website ahead of the graduation period. Officials say that the system aims to manage the high volume of people on campus and ensure safety during the ceremonies.

However, several student photographers say they were unaware of the process until it was too late.

A student photographer with they camera around they neck by the Great Hall. Photo: Sanele Sithole

Bakithi Mntungwa, a Bachelor of Education Honours student, said he only learned about the permit requirement shortly before graduations began.

“I only found out about the permit a few days before the first day of graduation, when I was already booked to take photos. By then, the application had already closed around February,” he said.

Other students echoed similar frustrations.

Thabo Mthembu, a Mining Engineering student, said while he understands the reasoning behind the rule, he believes student photographers should have been prioritised.

“I understand the need for regulation, but I had hoped student photographers would be given priority,” Mthembu said.

Mthembu also described difficulties accessing campus with his equipment, despite being a registered student, saying he was denied entry by security.

Students argue that communication could have been improved through official university channels such as email or social media platforms. They pointed to previous opportunities, such as photography competitions, which were widely advertised to students.

“When the applications closed, I was still dealing with registration and financial issues. Checking the website was the last thing on my mind,” Mntungwa added.

While acknowledging the importance of safety and organisation during graduation, both photographers believe that clearer communication and greater inclusion of student creatives could have prevented missed opportunities.

As graduation season has ended, students are calling for more transparent processes and better access in the future so that student photographers are not only present on campus, but part of capturing its most important moments.

Questions were sent to the EGO for comment, specifically regarding concerns raised by student photographers, but no response was received by the time of publication.

Who gets to tell queer stories on South African screens? 

What does it mean for queer individuals to see themselves on screen, and who decides how their stories are told?

At a panel hosted during the Human Rights Festival on March 28, filmmakers, writers, and journalists argued that while queer visibility in South African media has improved, control over those narratives remains contested. 

The discussion was organised by documentary filmmaker and narrative justice activist Bev Palesa Ditsie. It brought together creatives, including scriptwriter and director Oratile Mogoje, journalist Matuba Mahlatjie, film writer and activist Mondi Motadi, and reality TV director Olwethu Mlotshwa.  

While queer characters appear on screen, panellists stressed that visibility does not equal representation. The panellists emphasized that stories are still often shaped by people outside the community, resulting in portrayals that lean on trauma, stereotypes, or side characters rather than full, complex lives. 

“Visibility also comes with vulnerability,” said Mahlatjie. “If it’s not done thoughtfully, then we are vulnerable as queer people.”  

These portrayals, the panel argued, do more than misinform audiences as they also shape how queer people see themselves. Narratives that frame queerness as tragic or marginal can discourage self-expression, particularly for those still navigating their identities. 

But the issue is not only about creators. Audiences’ response to queer characters determines which stories survive.  

Mogoje pointed to a cycle where authentic queer stories struggle to gain traction because they are not always embraced by mainstream viewers. “The biggest culprit is the audience,” he said, sharing that rejection at this level can limit what gets funded and produced.  

For queer creatives, this lack of control is deeply felt. “We are not in charge of our own stories,” said Mlotshwa, highlighting the resistance that often meets narratives that challenge dominant or heteronormative perspectives. 

Despite these challenges, the panel pointed to emerging alternatives. Platforms such as YouTube help queer storytellers bypass traditional gatekeepers, creating space for more nuanced and self-defined narratives.  

30 years into democracy, queer people are no longer invisible on South African screens. But as the discussion made clear, the question is no longer just about being seen; it is about being fairly represented and being in control. 

The answer, panellists suggested, lies in shifting power where audiences question the stories that they consume, queer creatives are supported, and space is created for communities to tell their own stories, on their own terms. 

National Health Insurance debate deepens as experts warn of governance failures 

Beyond funding debates, deeper structural flaws in South Africa’s health system are becoming a barrier to NHI implementation. 

Wits University hosted a symposium on the future of the National Health Insurance (NHI) on March 26, where experts cautioned that without fixing systemic governance issues, the country’s healthcare reform could fail to achieve its goal.    

Since the signing into law of the  NHI in mid-2024, and a court order issued on 24 February 2026 that has affected its implementation, debate over whether the policy will succeed has intensified. 

 Supporters argue that healthcare is a right, not a privilege, and view the NHI as a mechanism to reduce inequality by pooling funds to ensure more equal access to quality healthcare services across public and private sectors. On the other hand, critics continue to question how the system will be funded and what trade-offs may be required to sustain it. 

A graphic representation of South Africa’s National Health Insurance (NHI), illustrating its universal healthcare goal alongside debates on funding and recent legal developments. Photo: Asisipho Mpahleni

While public debate around the NHI has largely focused on issues of inequality and funding, speakers at the symposium emphasised governance as a more immediate threat to the success of the reform.  

Experts such as Professor Alex van den Heever, who specialises in healthcare systems and financing, examined the deeper structural problems within South Africa’s health system, warning that without addressing these, the NHI could fail regardless of its funding model. 

“You’ve got a governance misalignment… [where] responsibility, authority, accountability [are] set in different places,” said van den Heever, pointing to one of the key structural weaknesses in South Africa’s healthcare system.  

He explained that this misalignment means that those responsible for delivering healthcare services often do not have the power to make key decisions, while those with decision-making authority are removed from the realities on the ground. This disconnect, he argued, leads to inefficiencies, weakens accountability, and slows down service delivery across the system.  

While much of the discussion focused on systemic governance failures, human rights and social justice activist Mark Heywood, brought the conversation back to its human impact. “Health is not pausing while we are sorting out the healthcare system,” he said, emphasizing the urgency of addressing these challenges. 

The discussion concluded with several proposals to address these challenges. These included strengthening the decision-making power at local health districts and hospitals, while also making sure strong local boards hold them accountable.  

Furthermore, the process of choosing leaders should be changed so that politicians can’t easily capture or corrupt public health institutions and procurement. Experts also proposed fairer funding rules and better regulation of private medical schemes, so money follows real service needs and incentives reward good, cost-effective care. 

Shake up within the Wits SRC

As Wits enters the new block, a reshuffle rocks the Wits Student Representative Council  

On Tuesday, March 31, the SRC announced a new structure and reshuffling of their council. They added a new representative to the executive wing and reinstated a member suspended due to a rape allegation late last year.

This change in leadership comes after the resignation of the former Secretary General, Antonett Khoza, on February 26, 2026. In her resignation statement she defined her tenure as being led by a “passion for fighting for access, accountability and dignity of students”.

She added that, “stepping down is not surrender”, but “a strategic withdrawal from a position that no longer allows me to serve effectively under its current conditions”.



The reshuffle resulted in the co-option of an existing member of the executive student governing body by the Dean of Student Affairs. Final year Medical student, Nonhlanhla Siwela, will fill the role of Student Development and Integration Officer.

“Whether elected to a particular position or not, I’ve always strongly believed in advocating for progressive change and making a meaningful difference no matter how small,” she told Wits Vuvuzela after accepting the position.

Alongside these structural changes, an update has also been provided on the sexual and gender-based harm allegations laid against, Musawenkosi Mavuso, in November 2025. After failure to reach the complainant for further information, the conclusion of the inquiry resulted in the lifting of his suspension. Mavuso reassumed his position in the SRC, taking up the portfolio of Bursaries, Fundraising and Stakeholder Relations.

SRC President, Nchabeleng Gilbert, said, “We are glad investigations have been conducted. The SRC reiterated the university findings and find that due diligence has been conducted.”

He added that the changes would not impact existing administrative processes.

The positions and their new representatives are as follow:

Secretary General: Aphelele Qwabi
Deputy Secretary General: Matlhatsi Mosima
Portfolio of Bursaries, Fundraising and Stakeholder Relations: Musawenkosi Mavuso
Student Development and Integration Officer: Nonhlanhla Siwela

What these changes will mean for the student body, remains to be seen.

The rise of urban settlements on traditional authority land  

Urban settlements such as townships are being created in rural areas which has raised concerns over ownership and the role of municipal authority.  

South Africa’s cities were never designed equally. Under Apartheid, millions of black South Africans were pushed to the outskirts of cities through policies such as the Group Areas Act, which enforced racial segregation and forced removals.   

Decades later, the spacial legacy lives on as those policies continue to shape where people live.  

The New South Institute (NIS) hosted a dialogue on March 11, 2026, with the emergence of urban settlements beyond conventional planning systems, specifically on land governed by traditional authorities, on the agenda.  

In a research paper, Professor Andries du Toit, NIS affiliate researcher and his team argue that these “settlements should be recognized as a distinct South African urban form, an auto-constructed suburbia, under informal institutions.” 

The houses built in these areas, like KwaMhlanga (Mpumalanga), Dassenhoek (eThekwini), Hammanskraal (Tshwane) and Kabokweni (Mbombela region), receive public infrastructure and services. These include roads, water and electricity, which are provided by private companies and/or private arrangements instead of their designated municipality.  

“There is a limited investment in social and community infrastructure particularly in the form of churches – people who live in these areas are going to have to travel and spend a lot of time traveling to access education and various other social opportunities and services,” said Dr. Andrew Charman, NIS affiliate researcher.  

The residents of these settlements are not given property with prospects of receiving a title deed, they are given a permission to occupy from the chief of the land. “It is not a deed of sale, you haven’t bought the land, you essentially paid the traditional authority for the service of allocation,” said du Toit.  

Dr. Gaynor Paradza from the Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI) said, “At most a municipality owns like 12 percent of the land in its jurisdiction and sometimes as little as two percent – as a municipality [they] don’t even have a say on what is going on.” The chief of the land is able to make authoritative decisions granted that they have the support and consent of the community.  

“The bottom line is that chiefs make decisions about land allocation, meaning that they are involved in town planning,” said Professor Mfaniseni Sihlongonyane head of the school of Architecture and Planning at wits university. “Maybe there are multiple visions of what cities should be especially in the African context,” he said. 

As housing costs rise in central urban areas, many find themselves settling on land that is governed by traditional leaders on the outskirts of cities, as it is more affordable. But the flipside is that they aren’t catered for by the municipality they fall under.  

EDITORIAL: The global cost of the U.S and Israel’s “pre-emptive strike” on Iran 

The war in the Middle East deeply impacts the lives of people across the globe and South Africa is no exception.   

Millions of people woke up to the breaking news on their screens, that the United States of America and the State of Israel, launched airstrikes targeted at Iran’s military bases and nuclear-related-infrastructure, on February 28, 2026. The prospects of a war started brewing after negotiations between the U.S and Iran in early February hit a dead end.  

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed by attacks from Israel and the U.S, and the current death toll in Iran currently surpasses 1, 000.  Iran has responded by launching missiles and drones towards Israel and targeting U.S military bases across the Middle East. The countries affected by the attacks from Iran include Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Kuwait.

But it was the confirmed closure of the Strait of Hormuz on March 2, that had an immediate global impact . According to Reuters, Iranian officials announced that the shipping corridor will be closed and any ship that attempts to pass through will be attacked.  

Approximately 20% of the world’s oil supply passes through the Strait of Hormuz, which means global oil prices, inflation, food and petrol prices are likely to increase significantly in the short term.   

South Africa imports oil in large quantities, most of its crude oil supply coming from Nigeria and Saudi Arabia. This means that citizens will experience higher petrol prices and businesses will experience delayed goods from abroad. The impact was felt instantly as the minister of Mineral and Petroleum Gwede Mantashe announced an increase in fuel prices effective from March 4, as a result of the current international factors. The price of petrol increased by 20c and diesel by 65c, residents still await further changes as the war continues.  

Behind the geopolitical strategies and missile attacks we watch from a distance are thousands of people whose lives have now been forever altered. Families are watching their homes and communities destroyed and those far removed from the shockwaves deal with rising costs and uncertainty.  

As the situation unfolds, we are confronted with the fact that war is never limited to the countries fighting it, its impact is felt by everyone. We all mourn and feel the pain of those directly impacted.  

Until the day global leaders choose dialogue and peace over destruction and violence, it will be us, ordinary citizens who continue to pay the price for their negligent and violent behaviour.